Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Oxygen Delivering System I: Nasal Cannula and Face Mask01:26

Oxygen Delivering System I: Nasal Cannula and Face Mask

The human body requires oxygen to function, and when the natural process of respiration is hindered, external devices, including the following, are needed to help deliver this vital gas.
Nasal Cannula
A nasal cannula is a lightweight tube split at one end into two prongs and placed in the nostrils. It is typically used to deliver low to medium levels of oxygen.
Suggested flow rate: The suggested flow rate for a nasal cannula typically ranges between 1 and 6 L/min.
Oxygen percentage setting:...
Olfaction01:25

Olfaction

The sense of smell is achieved through the activities of the olfactory system. It starts when an airborne odorant enters the nasal cavity and reaches olfactory epithelium (OE). The OE is protected by a thin layer of mucus, which also serves the purpose of dissolving more complex compounds into simpler chemical odorants. The size of the OE and the density of sensory neurons varies among species; in humans, the OE is only about 9-10 cm2.
The olfactory receptors are embedded in the cilia of the...
Nose and Nasal Cavity01:24

Nose and Nasal Cavity

The nose is composed of an observable exterior segment (external nose) and an internal segment within the skull known as the nasal cavity (internal nose). The external nose, visible on the face, consists of a framework of bone and hyaline cartilage enveloped in skin and muscle and lined with a mucous membrane. This structure is supported by the frontal bone, nasal bones, and maxillary bone and is supplemented by a cartilaginous framework comprising the septal nasal cartilage, lateral nasal...
Olfactory Receptors: Location and Structure01:03

Olfactory Receptors: Location and Structure

The process of olfaction, also known as the sense of smell, is a sophisticated chemical response system. The specialized sensory neurons that facilitate this process, known as olfactory receptor neurons, are situated in an upper segment of the nasal cavity, known as the olfactory epithelium. Olfactory sensory neurons are bipolar, with their dendrites extending from the epithelium's apex into the mucus that lines the nasal cavity. Airborne molecules, when inhaled, traverse the olfactory...
Physiology of Smell and Olfactory Pathway01:20

Physiology of Smell and Olfactory Pathway

Humans detect odors with the help of specialized cells located in the upper part of the nasal cavity, called olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs). ORNs possess hair-like structures called cilia, which are receptive to sensations from the inhaled air. When an odorant molecule binds to a specific receptor on the cell of the cilia, it leads to a series of events that ultimately cause the ORN to send electrical signals to the olfactory bulb in the brain through the olfactory nerves.
The olfactory...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blinded 2-Year Longitudinal Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antigenemia in Long COVID.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2026
Same author

Digital seed amplification assay for TDP-43 aggregate quantification in CSF.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Differences in SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Persistence in Individuals With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases Compared to the General Population: A RECOVER-Adult Cohort Study.

Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

High-throughput single-vesicle imaging platform for direct extracellular vesicle profiling of human plasma.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Endovascular profiles linked to neutrophil activation in children and young adults with long COVID.

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

Attomolar fecal cytokine profiling reveals gut immune dynamics and disease states.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Advancements and Challenges in Computer-Assisted Medical Interventions for Image-Guided Prostate Cancer Treatments.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Recent Advances in mRNA Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence-Based Analysis of Laparoscopic Imaging for Intraoperative Surgical Decision Support.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Viscoelasticity of the Heart: An Overview of Viscoelastic Measurements at Different Scales.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Digital Twins for Biofluids.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function
10:42

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function

Published on: July 30, 2017

Artificial noses.

Shannon E Stitzel1, Matthew J Aernecke, David R Walt

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA. sstitzel@towson.edu

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
|March 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article reviews the development of electronic sensing devices designed to mimic the human sense of smell. These systems use arrays of sensors that react to different chemicals, combined with computer programs to identify specific odors. The authors discuss various sensor types, including electrical, gravimetric, and optical technologies, and their uses in fields like food safety, security, and healthcare.

Keywords:
electronic noseodor discriminationpattern recognitionbiosensor technology

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Real-time In Vitro Monitoring of Odorant Receptor Activation by an Odorant in the Vapor Phase
09:53

Real-time In Vitro Monitoring of Odorant Receptor Activation by an Odorant in the Vapor Phase

Published on: April 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function
10:42

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function

Published on: July 30, 2017

Real-time In Vitro Monitoring of Odorant Receptor Activation by an Odorant in the Vapor Phase
09:53

Real-time In Vitro Monitoring of Odorant Receptor Activation by an Odorant in the Vapor Phase

Published on: April 23, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Sensory systems research within artificial noses technology
  • Analytical chemistry and biosensor engineering

Background:

The mechanisms underlying biological odor detection remain complex and challenging to replicate in synthetic platforms. Prior research has shown that mammals identify diverse scents using a limited set of receptors. That uncertainty drove scientists to explore cross-reactive sensor arrays for odor identification. It was already known that these systems generate unique patterns for distinct chemical compounds. No prior work had resolved the optimal integration of hardware and software for universal detection. This gap motivated the development of various electronic sensing technologies over several decades. Early efforts relied on simple metal oxide components to achieve basic discrimination capabilities. Current engineering approaches now incorporate sophisticated computational models to improve the accuracy of scent recognition tasks.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the development and application of artificial noses. This study addresses the need to understand how synthetic systems replicate the mammalian olfactory process. The researchers seek to clarify the role of cross-reactive sensor arrays in achieving robust odor discrimination. They intend to evaluate the diverse range of sensor technologies that have emerged since the inception of the field. The authors aim to categorize the most common sensor types, specifically focusing on electrical, gravimetric, and optical platforms. They also seek to explore the practical utility of these systems in various real-world sectors. This work addresses the gap in knowledge regarding the current status and future trajectory of odor-sensing technology. The study provides a structured overview to inform both researchers and industry professionals about the state of the art in chemical sensing.

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a systematic review of existing literature regarding synthetic olfactory technologies. Their review approach involved categorizing various hardware platforms based on their underlying physical transduction mechanisms. They examined the evolution of sensing components from early metal oxide designs to modern sophisticated arrays. The researchers evaluated the performance of these systems across multiple industrial and scientific application domains. They synthesized data concerning the integration of signal processing techniques with hardware outputs. The study utilized a comparative framework to highlight the strengths and limitations of distinct sensor types. They also assessed the current state of commercialized devices versus experimental prototypes reported in academic journals. This methodology allowed for a structured overview of the field's historical progress and current capabilities.

Main Results:

The authors report that the inaugural synthetic olfactory system, introduced in 1982, utilized a tin-oxide sensor array. Key findings from the literature demonstrate that modern systems now incorporate a wide range of diverse sensor technologies. The review identifies electrical, gravimetric, and optical sensors as the most frequently employed modalities in current research. These systems effectively mimic biological odor detection by generating unique response patterns for individual chemical compounds. The literature indicates that these devices are successfully utilized for food and beverage quality control assessments. Furthermore, the findings show that these systems are deployed for the detection of chemical warfare agents. The results also highlight the utility of these platforms in various medical diagnostic applications. The authors conclude that the combination of cross-reactive arrays and pattern recognition algorithms creates robust discrimination capabilities.

Conclusions:

The authors synthesize current advancements in synthetic olfactory systems to provide a comprehensive overview of the field. They emphasize that the integration of diverse sensor modalities enhances the robustness of odor discrimination. Their review suggests that electrical, gravimetric, and optical platforms each offer distinct advantages for specific detection tasks. The researchers propose that ongoing improvements in pattern recognition algorithms will further refine the sensitivity of these devices. They note that practical applications span from industrial quality assurance to critical security and medical monitoring. The synthesis indicates that future developments will likely focus on increasing the portability and versatility of these sensing units. Their analysis implies that the field is moving toward more integrated and intelligent chemical sensing solutions. The authors conclude that the evolution of these technologies continues to expand the potential for automated scent analysis across various sectors.

The researchers propose that these systems identify scents by utilizing cross-reactive sensor arrays that produce distinct response patterns for each odorant. This mechanism mimics the biological olfactory process, where a limited number of receptors detect a vast array of chemical compounds through combinatorial activation.

The authors highlight three primary categories: electrical, gravimetric, and optical sensors. While electrical sensors often utilize metal oxides, gravimetric and optical platforms employ different physical principles to detect chemical interactions, offering varied sensitivity levels for specific applications compared to traditional methods.

The authors suggest that pattern recognition algorithms are necessary to interpret the complex data generated by the sensor arrays. These computational tools transform raw signals into identifiable scent profiles, which is a requirement for distinguishing between similar chemical signatures in real-world environments.

The authors explain that sensor arrays serve as the front-end hardware, capturing chemical information. These components act as the primary interface, converting physical odorant presence into measurable signals that the downstream software then processes to determine the specific chemical identity.

The researchers report that these systems are applied in food and beverage quality control, chemical warfare agent detection, and medical diagnostics. These fields rely on the ability of the sensors to provide rapid, reliable, and automated analysis of complex chemical mixtures.

The authors state that future trends will focus on advancing the technology to improve performance and expand utility. They propose that continued innovation in both hardware sensitivity and algorithmic processing will likely enhance the capability of these devices to handle increasingly complex detection challenges.