Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'Just Normal Everyday Things': Patient experiences of occupation-based therapy in an intensive care unit (EFFORT-ICU).

The British journal of occupational therapy·2026
Same author

"How Could the Procedure be Done to Care for Them?": An Interpretive Description Study of Procedural Care in a Pediatric Oncology Setting.

Seminars in oncology nursing·2025
Same author

Developing Self-Management in Type 1 Diabetes at Secondary Schools: Who Is Responsible? A Qualitative Study.

The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association·2024
Same author

Efficacy of Early Enhanced Occupational Therapy in an Intensive Care Unit (EFFORT-ICU): A Single-Site Feasibility Trial.

The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association·2023
Same author

A qualitative study of Singaporean perspectives on returning to work after stroke.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2023
Same author

Occupational multi-level responsiveness: Describing the skills used by occupational therapists working with children seeking asylum in Australia.

Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Development of the student practice evaluation form revised edition package.

Merrill Turpin1, Cate Fitzgerald, Sylvia Rodger

  • 1Division of Occupational Therapy, School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. m.turpin@uq.edu.au

Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
|March 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary

The Student Practice Evaluation Form Revised Edition (SPEF-R) Package was developed to improve student placement assessments. This revised tool, based on stakeholder feedback and action research, enhances evaluation clarity and utility for professional practice placements.

More Related Videos

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Educational Assessment
  • Higher Education Pedagogy

Background:

  • The Student Placement Evaluation Form (SPEF) was a national tool for evaluating student performance in professional practice placements.
  • Development of a revised edition was initiated to address identified areas for improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the development process of the Student Practice Evaluation Form Revised Edition (SPEF-R) Package.
  • To create an enhanced assessment tool for professional practice placements grounded in stakeholder input and contemporary feedback principles.

Main Methods:

  • An action research methodology was employed across three cycles: national consultation, package development, and feedback/piloting.
  • Stakeholder consultation included academics, practice educators, and students.

Main Results:

  • The original SPEF's strengths included structure, clarity, and utility; concerns related to length and training needs.
  • The SPEF-R Package incorporated revisions to the form and handbook, enhancing feedback and experience recording tools.
  • The development process involved iterative feedback, revision, and a final launch.

Conclusions:

  • Action research is effective for addressing practice issues in higher education.
  • The SPEF-R development integrated stakeholder views and formative feedback principles.
  • Further research is needed to evaluate the SPEF-R's assessment properties; an electronic version and training website are in development.