Systematic computational analysis of structure-activity relationships: concepts, challenges and recent advances
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Lisa Peltason1, Jürgen Bajorath
1Department of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Dahlmannstr. 2, D-53113 Bonn, Germany.
Abstract:
The exploration of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of small molecules is a central aspect of medicinal chemistry. Typically, SARs are analyzed on a one-by-one basis, and chemical intuition and experience play an important role in this process. Since the 1960s, computational approaches have been developed to aid in SAR exploration that largely, but not exclusively, rely on the quantitative (Q)SAR paradigm. Accordingly, QSAR analysis has long been a mainstay of compound optimization efforts. However, the strong compound class dependence of SAR features and their intrinsic heterogeneity often pose severe constraints on the applicability of these methods. In addition to QSAR approaches, conceptually different molecular similarity methods are also applied to identify novel active compounds. In order to complement and further extend the current repertoire of computational methods, SAR analysis functions have recently been introduced that evaluate and compare SAR features on a large scale, extract SAR information from compound data sets and prioritize SARs that are promising targets for optimization. SAR analysis functions are designed to systematically profile and compare SARs contained in different data sets and characterize both global and local SAR features. Numerical SAR analysis is complemented by intuitive graphical representations of SAR landscapes.
Related Concept Videos
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of the aromatic...
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
The direct-acting...
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Reversible inhibitors display short to medium durations of action. Short-acting agents include simple alcohols with...
Cholinergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...

