Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory01:22

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

Improving short-term memory can be achieved through techniques like chunking and rehearsal. Chunking involves organizing information into larger, more manageable units. This technique is particularly useful for information that exceeds the typical memory span of between five and nine items. For instance, logging into an online account with a password like "ta89vq0179gz" involves grouping letters and numbers into three chunks—ta89, vq01, and 79gz. It makes large amounts of information more...
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory01:26

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or playing an...
Storage01:23

Storage

A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze each...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inattention over time-on-task: the role of motivation in mitigating temporal increases in media multitasking.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Attention in hindsight: Using stimulated recall to capture dynamic fluctuations in attentional engagement.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The Effects of Anticipating Metacognitive Judgments about Mind-Wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

The effects of cannabis on mind-wandering.

Heliyon·2026
Same author

Agentic aspects of attentional disengagement.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2025
Same author

Attention in our digital ecosystem: The five interactive components that drive media multitasking.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Memory load affects visual search processes without influencing search efficiency.

Grayden J F Solman1, J Allan Cheyne, Daniel Smilek

  • 1University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. gsolman@uwaterloo.ca

Vision Research
|March 24, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Memory load impacts visual search by affecting eye movements during the search phase, not just before or after. This challenges previous assumptions about how cognitive load influences visual search processes.

More Related Videos

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Visual search performance is often assessed using response times and search slopes.
  • Concurrent memory load is typically thought to influence pre- or post-search processes, not the search itself.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the precise impact of memory load on distinct phases of visual search using eye-movement data.
  • To challenge the conventional interpretation of search slopes in understanding cognitive load effects.

Main Methods:

  • Monitoring participants' eye movements during a visual search task with varying distractor numbers.
  • Introducing a concurrent memory load condition alongside a no-load condition.
  • Decomposing response times into pre-search, search, and post-search phases based on eye-movement data.

Main Results:

  • Memory load slowed overall response times but did not alter search slopes.
  • Detailed eye-movement analysis revealed that memory load significantly affected the search phase itself.
  • Under memory load, fixations were more distant from search items and closer to previously fixated locations.

Conclusions:

  • Memory load influences the visual search process directly, contrary to interpretations based solely on search slopes.
  • Standard interpretations of search slopes may not fully capture the effects of cognitive load on visual search.
  • Eye-movement analysis provides a more granular understanding of how cognitive load modulates visual attention and search strategies.