Treatment outcomes of anorectal melanoma

Byung Min Choi1, Hyoung Ran Kim, Hae-Ran Yun

  • 1Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Insights

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) may offer longer survival for anorectal melanoma (AM) patients compared to wide local excision (WE). Early diagnosis using S-100 and HMB-45 markers is crucial for this rare anal cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Pathology

Background:

  • Anorectal melanoma (AM) is an exceptionally rare malignancy.
  • Limited data exist on optimal surgical management for AM.
  • This study addresses the need for evidence-based treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively analyze treatment outcomes for anorectal melanoma.
  • To compare the efficacy of different surgical approaches for AM.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 19 patients with AM undergoing surgical resection.
  • Analysis of clinicopathological factors and surgical methods (abdominoperineal resection vs. wide local excision).

Main Results:

  • Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was associated with significantly longer overall survival (64.1 months) compared to wide local excision (WE) (10.9 months).
  • No patients undergoing WE survived beyond 13 months.
  • S-100 and HMB-45 immunohistochemical markers were positive in all cases, aiding diagnosis.

Conclusions:

  • A high index of suspicion is vital for diagnosing AM in patients with anal symptoms.
  • S-100 and HMB-45 are valuable diagnostic markers for AM.
  • Data suggest APR may be a superior surgical option for improving survival in AM patients.