Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026
07:10
Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE)
Published on: April 21, 2019
Comparative study of simple semiquantitative dust mite allergen tests
Yasuaki Saijo1, Yoshihiko Nakagi, Yoshihiko Sugioka
1Department of Health Science, Asahikawa Medical College, Midorigaoka, E2-1-1-1 Asahikawa, 078-8510, Hokkaido, Japan, y-saijo@asahikawa-med.ac.jp.
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
|March 25, 2011
Summary
The Mitey Checker test is more accurate than the Acarex test for evaluating dust mite allergen levels in homes. This finding is crucial for assessing mite allergen exposure in Japanese living environments.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Allergen Detection
- Indoor Air Quality
Background:
- Dust mite allergens are significant indoor air pollutants contributing to allergic diseases.
- Accurate semiquantitative tests are needed for practical assessment of mite allergen exposure in homes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of two commercially available dust mite allergen tests, Acarex test(®) and Mitey Checker(®).
- To determine which test is better suited for practical use in evaluating mite allergen exposure.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated 106 floor, bed, and sofa surfaces using Acarex test(®), Mitey Checker(®), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
- Collected dust samples from standardized 1 m(2) areas for analysis.
Main Results:
- Mitey Checker(®) demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity compared to Acarex test(®) for predicting Der 1 levels (≥2 μg/g and ≥10 μg/g).
- Mitey Checker(®) showed better percent agreement (70.0%) and kappa (0.505) compared to Acarex test(®) (47.2% and 0.234).
Conclusions:
- Mitey Checker(®) is superior to Acarex test(®) for evaluating mite allergen exposure in Japanese living environments.
- The higher sensitivity and specificity of Mitey Checker(®) make it more suitable for practical application.
