Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Use of Two Intracorporeal Ventricular Assist Devices As a Total Artificial Heart
Published on: May 11, 2018
Heart transplant vs left ventricular assist device in heart transplant-eligible patients
Matthew L Williams1, Jaimin R Trivedi, Kelly C McCants
1Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Louisville, and Jewish Hospital Transplant Center, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA.
Insights
One-year survival outcomes for patients awaiting heart transplantation were similar whether they received a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to transplant or underwent immediate heart transplantation. LVAD use did not negatively impact heart transplant outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Patients awaiting heart transplantation face prolonged wait times, leading to clinical deterioration and significant mortality.
- The effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as a bridge to transplant (BTT) compared to immediate heart transplantation requires further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 1-year outcomes and effectiveness of LVAD as a bridge to transplant versus immediate heart transplantation.
- To assess the impact of prior LVAD support on subsequent heart transplant outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective evaluation of patients listed for heart transplantation between January 2009 and December 2009.
- Comparison of 1-year survival, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates between patients receiving LVAD for BTT and those undergoing immediate heart transplantation.
- Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
Main Results:
- One-year survival rates were similar between the LVAD BTT group (29 patients) and the heart transplant group (13 patients).
- Hospitalization durations and readmission rates within 3 months were comparable between the two groups, with infection being the most common cause for readmission.
- No in-hospital deaths occurred in either group, with 3 late deaths observed in the LVAD BTT group.
Conclusions:
- One-year outcomes for heart transplant candidates are comparable whether they receive an allograft or utilize an LVAD as a bridge to transplant.
- Prior LVAD support does not adversely affect subsequent heart transplant outcomes.
- Current decision-making models for heart transplant eligibility may need reevaluation in light of improving LVAD outcomes.
Background:
Patients listed for heart transplant have a prolonged wait time, with continued deterioration, poor quality of life, and 10% mortality. Although recent bridge to transplant (BTT) studies demonstrated 1-year survival similar to heart transplantation, doubt remains about overall effectiveness as a treatment strategy compared with waiting and implanting a left ventricular device (LVAD) only as a last resort. We evaluated 1-year outcome and effectiveness of LVAD vs heart transplantation.
Methods:
Patients on the heart transplantation list, either receiving an allograft or LVAD for BTT from January 2009 to December 2009 were evaluated. Of 43 patients treated, 1 received both LVAD and an allograft during same admission was removed from the analysis. All patients but one who received an allograft had prior LVAD. Descriptive and univariate (t test) statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were used for analyses.
Results:
LVAD for BTT was used in 29 patients (51.4±12.8 years, 6.9% women), and 13 (51.1±11.6 years, 15.38% women) underwent heart transplantation. Initial hospital length of stay was 17.5±14.4 days in BTT group and 14.3±4.6 days in heart transplant group (p=0.44) At 1 year, the total number of days spent in the hospital (operation and related complications), including index hospitalization was 11.6±14.3 days/100 days in BTT and 7.9±9.0 days/100 days in heart transplantation (p=0.38). A total of 41% BTT and 46% heart transplant patients had one readmission within 3 months of the index hospitalization. Infection was the most common cause of readmission in both groups. The 1-year survival was similar for both groups (no hospital death in either group; 3 late deaths in the BTT group).
Conclusions:
One-year outcomes for patients eligible for heart transplantation were similar whether they received an allograft or LVAD for BTT. Heart transplant outcome for patients with LVAD were not adversely affected. Improving outcomes for patients treated with LVAD suggest that current decision models for patients eligible for heart transplantation may need to be reevaluated.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

