Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptual Learning as a Rehabilitation Approach to Enhance Motion Processing in Maculopathy Patients.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Anticipatory vibrotactile cues about upcoming turns reduce motion sickness: A study with car passengers on public roads.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same author

Audiovisual estimation of Time-to-contact.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Visual, auditory, and audiovisual time-to-collision estimation among participants with age-related macular degeneration compared to a normal-vision group: The TTC-AMD study.

PloS one·2025
Same author

German Translation and Validation of the Visually Induced Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire Short (VIMSSQ-short).

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Free Association Database for a 62-Word Dataset Including Emotion and Colour Terms in English, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Lithuanian, and Spanish: Data from 14 Countries.

Journal of open psychology data·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Temporal-range estimation of multiple objects: evidence for an early bottleneck.

Robin Baurès1, Daniel Oberfeld, Heiko Hecht

  • 1Department of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany. robin.baures@ifsttar.fr

Acta Psychologica
|March 29, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating time-to-contact (TTC) for two objects causes asymmetric interference, with later objects overestimated. This bottleneck occurs early in visual processing, not during response timing.

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Neuroscience

Background:

  • Estimating time-to-contact (TTC) is crucial for safe navigation and interaction.
  • Parallel TTC estimation of multiple objects reveals asymmetric interference patterns.
  • This interference suggests a processing bottleneck, but its locus (early visual vs. late motor) remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the locus of the processing bottleneck in parallel time-to-contact (TTC) estimation.
  • To differentiate between early visual processing constraints and late response-related constraints.
  • To determine if interference occurs during optic flow analysis or response execution.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Sperling-like prediction-motion task with two approaching objects.
  • Participants estimated TTC for a cued target object.
  • Auditory cues were presented at either motion-onset (early) or occlusion-onset (late) to manipulate visual processing demands.

Main Results:

  • Asymmetric interference was observed only in the occlusion-onset condition, where both objects required visual processing until disappearance.
  • Symmetric interference occurred in the motion-onset condition, suggesting irrelevant visual information was disregarded early.
  • The results indicate that the TTC estimation bottleneck is not related to response execution but occurs earlier in visual processing.

Conclusions:

  • The processing bottleneck in time-to-contact (TTC) estimation arises from early visual processing stages, likely during the analysis of optic flow.
  • Interference effects are dependent on the timing of task-relevant cues, influencing visual processing load.
  • This finding has implications for understanding multi-object perception and attentional limitations in dynamic environments.