Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Methods of clinical ethics].

J F Drane1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania 16444.

Boletin De La Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau
|May 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Navigating medical ethics requires a structured method for sound decision-making. Employing a reliable strategy helps avoid errors and ensures factual, case-specific moral evaluations in healthcare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bioethical perspectives from Ibero-America.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·1996
Same author

Physician assisted suicide & voluntary active euthanasia: social ethics and the role of hospice.

The American journal of hospice & palliative care·1995
Same author

The best-interest standard: surrogate decision making and quality of life.

The Journal of clinical ethics·1995
Same author

A professional medical ethic: Drane and Coulehan's response.

Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)·1993
Same author

The concept of futility. Patients do not have a right to demand medically useless treatment. Counterpoint.

Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)·1993
Same author

Market economics and biomedical ethics.

Pennsylvania medicine·1993

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Medical ethics decisions are inherently complex due to numerous clinical alternatives.
  • Each patient case presents unique circumstances, challenging predetermined ethical judgments.
  • The absence of a standardized approach can lead to ethical dilemmas and suboptimal outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the critical role of a systematic method in medical ethics.
  • To highlight the necessity of a strategy for achieving moral discernment in clinical practice.
  • To underscore the importance of fact-based evaluations in ethical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • This study is primarily a conceptual analysis and synthesis of ethical principles.
  • It reviews the fundamental nature of ethical decision-making strategies.
  • Focuses on the characteristics of a robust method for moral evaluation.

Main Results:

  • A well-defined method is essential for making defensible ethical decisions in medicine.
  • Effective methods prevent serious ethical mistakes by grounding evaluations in facts.
  • Such strategies ensure that ethical standards remain relevant to real-life clinical situations.

Conclusions:

  • Medical ethics is fundamentally a methodological approach to moral evaluation.
  • Implementing a consistent, fact-based strategy is crucial for professional medical ethics.
  • A sound method promotes moral discernment and uniformly appropriate clinical decisions.

Related Experiment Videos