Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
06:13

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump

Published on: February 5, 2021

Intra-aortic balloon pump implantation does not affect long-term survival after isolated CABG in patients with acute

D Joskowiak1, M Szlapka, U Kappert

  • 1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Dresden Ltd. University Hospital, Dresden, Germany. d.joskowiak@herzzentrum-dresden.com

Insights

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support during emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shows similar survival rates regardless of preoperative or intraoperative placement. Timing of IABP implantation does not significantly impact in-hospital or long-term outcomes in these high-risk patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a critical support therapy for patients with heart failure undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
  • The timing of IABP implantation (preoperative vs. intraoperative) is a key factor influencing patient outcomes.
  • Understanding this impact is crucial for managing high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationship between IABP implantation timing and patient survival.
  • To evaluate the impact of preoperative versus intraoperative IABP placement on early, mid-term, and long-term survival in AMI patients undergoing emergent CABG.
  • To assess the overall survival rates in patients receiving IABP support during emergent CABG for NSTEMI and STEMI.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 472 patients with AMI (NSTEMI and STEMI) who underwent emergent CABG.
  • 158 patients received IABP support, with 57 receiving preoperative and 101 receiving intraoperative implantation.
  • In-hospital and follow-up survival (mean 37 months) were the primary endpoints.

Main Results:

  • Overall in-hospital mortality was 17.1%, with no significant difference between preoperative (17.6%) and intraoperative (16.8%) IABP groups.
  • Mid- and long-term survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were comparable between the two IABP timing groups.
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in survival outcomes based on IABP implantation timing.

Conclusions:

  • CABG with IABP support in high-risk AMI patients is associated with acceptable in-hospital and long-term survival.
  • The decision for IABP placement should be individualized based on preoperative status and intraoperative course.
  • IABP placement timing does not appear to significantly affect long-term outcomes after isolated CABG in AMI patients.
Abstract