Carotid patch angioplasty: immediate and long-term results

To determine the benefit of carotid patch angioplasty, a retrospective study of 1000 consecutive carotid endarterectomies was done. Based on the type of carotid endarterectomy closure, patients were divided into four groups: 250 had primary closure, 250 had expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch, 250 had Dacron patch, and 250 had saphenous vein patch. On the basis of operative technique or type of carotid artery closure, no statistical difference was found in the incidence of postoperative stroke (p greater than 0.25): primary closure 1.6% (4), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene 2.0% (5), Dacron patch 1.6% (4), and saphenous vein patch (0). Postoperative carotid patency was determined by B-mode ultrasonography, and 717 patients were evaluated in follow-up extending to 6 years (mean 37.8 months). Based on the method of carotid endarterectomy closure, no significant difference (p greater than 0.25) was found in the incidence of significant restenosis (greater than 50% diameter reduction): primary closure 4.0% (7), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene 4.0% (6), Dacron 5.4% (9), and saphenous vein 1.0% (2). Significant restenosis was most frequent in habitual smokers (93%, 25/28) and females (78%, 22/28) despite the method of carotid endarterectomy closure. No statistical difference was found in the incidence of late ipsilateral stroke either (p greater than 0.25): primary closure 2.9% (5), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene 2% (3), Dacron 5% (3), and saphenous vein 0%. These results indicate that the incidence of postoperative stroke, regardless of method of arterial closure, was not statistically different. The method of carotid closure did not appear to affect the occurrence of late ipsilateral stroke or restenosis; however, patch angioplasty with saphenous vein appears appropriate in habitual smokers, and likely in patients with small internal carotid arteries.