Physiologically based biokinetic (PBBK) model for safrole bioactivation and detoxification in rats
E Martati1, M G Boersma, A Spenkelink
1Division of Toxicology, Wageningen University, Tuinlaan 5, 6703 HE Wageningen, The Netherlands. erryana.martati@wur.nl
Abstract:
A physiologically based biokinetic (PBBK) model for alkenylbenzene safrole in rats was developed using in vitro metabolic parameters determined using relevant tissue fractions. The performance of the model was evaluated by comparison of the predicted levels of 1,2-dihydroxy-4-allylbenzene and 1'-hydroxysafrole glucuronide to levels of these metabolites reported in the literature to be excreted in the urine of rats exposed to safrole and by comparison of the predicted amount of total urinary safrole metabolites to the reported levels of safrole metabolites in the urine of safrole exposed rats. These comparisons revealed that the predictions adequately match observed experimental values. Next, the model was used to predict the relative extent of bioactivation and detoxification of safrole at different oral doses. At low as well as high doses, P450 mediated oxidation of safrole mainly occurs in the liver in which 1,2-dihydroxy-4-allylbenzene was predicted to be the major P450 metabolite of safrole. A dose dependent shift in P450 mediated oxidation leading to a relative increase in bioactivation at high doses was not observed. Comparison of the results obtained for safrole with the results previously obtained with PBBK models for the related alkenylbenzenes estragole and methyleugenol revealed that the overall differences in bioactivation of the three alkenylbenzenes to their ultimate carcinogenic 1'-sulfooxy metabolites are limited. This is in line with the generally less than 4-fold difference in their level of DNA binding in in vitro and in vivo studies and their almost similar BMDL(10) values (lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose that gives 10% increase in tumor incidence over background level) obtained in in vivo carcinogenicity studies. It is concluded that in spite of differences in the rates of specific metabolic conversions, overall the levels of bioactivation of the three alkenylbenzenes are comparable which is in line with their comparable carcinogenic potential.
More Related Videos
10:44Mass Spectrometry and Luminogenic-based Approaches to Characterize Phase I Metabolic Competency of In Vitro Cell Cultures
Published on: March 28, 2017
08:28Microsurgical Skills of Establishing Permanent Jugular Vein Cannulation in Rats for Serial Blood Sampling of Orally Administered Drug
Published on: December 14, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion, mediated...
Bioactivation and Tissue Toxicity
Phase II Reactions: Glutathione Conjugation and Mercapturic Acid Formation
Several distinctive characteristics distinguish glutathione conjugation from other phase II...
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
Drug Biotransformation: Overview
Drug Biotransformation: Overview
