Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Surface Potential Measurement of Bacteria Using Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy
Published on: November 28, 2014
Understanding the surface potential of water
Shawn M Kathmann1, I-Feng William Kuo, Christopher J Mundy
1Chemical and Materials Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States. shawn.kathmann@pnl.gov
This study resolves inconsistencies in calculating liquid water's surface potential by comparing ab initio charge distributions with experimental methods. Quantum mechanical potentials align with electron diffraction, not electrochemical measurements, suggesting exclusions for accurate comparisons.
Area of Science:
- Physical Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
- Surface Science
Background:
- Quantifying surface potential at the liquid-vapor interface is crucial for understanding interfacial phenomena.
- Discrepancies exist between theoretical models (ab initio charge density, partial charge models) and experimental measurements of surface potential.
- Existing models often yield different electric potentials, particularly in regions outside molecular interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To resolve inconsistencies in quantifying the surface potential of liquid water at the liquid-vapor interface.
- To compare ab initio electronic charge density and effective atomic partial charge models.
- To validate theoretical surface potential calculations against experimental techniques.
Main Methods:
- Utilized explicit ab initio electronic charge density calculations.
- Employed effective atomic partial charge models for liquid water.
- Compared computed electrostatic surface potentials with high-energy electron diffraction and electron holography measurements.
- Contrasted theoretical results with electrochemical measurements.
Main Results:
- Ab initio electronic charge density calculations provide a more accurate representation of the electrostatic surface potential compared to partial charge models.
- Computed surface potentials from quantum mechanical charge distributions show good agreement with high-energy electron diffraction and electron holography data.
- Significant discrepancies were observed when comparing computed potentials with electrochemical measurements.
- Identified specific regions of space that should be excluded for accurate comparison between computed and electrochemical surface potentials.
Conclusions:
- The study successfully resolved inconsistencies in surface potential quantification for liquid water.
- High-energy electron holography serves as a valuable benchmark for validating ab initio computed surface potentials.
- A novel interpretation of ab initio surface potentials is proposed, emphasizing the need for careful comparison with experimental data, particularly in electrochemistry.
- Recommendations are provided for refining comparisons between theoretical and electrochemical measurements by excluding certain spatial regions.
Related Concept Videos
The Electrical Double Layer
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
Surface Tension and Surface Energy
Consider a beaker filled with liquid. The bulk molecules in the liquid experience equal attractive forces on all sides with the surrounding molecules. However, the surface molecules experience a net attractive force downward due to the bulk molecules. The surface of the liquid behaves like a stretched membrane,...
Calculations of Electric Potential II
Consider a...
Processes at Electrodes
Surface Tension of Fluid
Surface tension varies with...

