Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Live Imaging of Antifungal Activity by Human Primary Neutrophils and Monocytes in Response to A. fumigatus
Published on: April 19, 2017
Empiric antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia
Jenna J Ferrara1, Conan MacDougall, Jason C Gallagher
1Department of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, St. Margaret Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract:
Invasive fungal infections, most commonly candidiasis or aspergillosis, are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with neutropenia. Difficulty in diagnosing invasive fungal infections in these patients complicates decisions regarding pharmacotherapy. Because of the difficult diagnosis and the significant morbidity and mortality of fungal infections in patients with neutropenia, systemic antifungal agents are used as empiric antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia who are not responding to antibacterial therapy. The pharmacotherapy of invasive fungal infections has evolved rapidly within the past several years as numerous antifungal agents--different formulations of amphotericin B, azoles, and echinocandins--have become available for use as empiric antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia. Various levels of evidence support the use of these agents for this indication. Their use is limited, however, by drug intolerance, drug interactions, adverse-event profiles, and limited activity with some mold species. Thus, considerations for selecting an antifungal drug for empiric use in patients with febrile neutropenia should include the epidemiology of fungal infections in the individual patient's institution and the specific clinical circumstances of the patient.
Insights
Empiric antifungal therapy is crucial for neutropenic patients with febrile neutropenia due to difficult diagnosis and high mortality. Selecting the right antifungal agent requires considering institutional fungal infection epidemiology and patient-specific factors.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Hematology
Background:
- Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) significantly increase morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients.
- Diagnostic challenges in neutropenic patients complicate timely pharmacotherapy decisions.
- Empiric antifungal therapy is standard for febrile neutropenia unresponsive to antibiotics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evolution and considerations for empiric antifungal pharmacotherapy in neutropenic patients.
- To highlight the challenges and factors influencing the selection of antifungal agents.
Main Methods:
- Review of current antifungal agents including amphotericin B formulations, azoles, and echinocandins.
- Analysis of evidence supporting their use in febrile neutropenia.
- Consideration of limitations such as drug intolerance, interactions, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- Numerous antifungal agents are now available for empiric therapy.
- Evidence supports their use, but limitations persist.
- Drug intolerance, interactions, adverse events, and variable activity against molds impact efficacy.
Conclusions:
- Selection of empiric antifungal therapy requires careful consideration of institutional fungal infection epidemiology.
- Patient-specific clinical circumstances are critical in choosing the appropriate antifungal drug.
- Ongoing evolution of pharmacotherapy necessitates informed decision-making to optimize patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Antifungal Agents
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Antiprotozoal Agents
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Antiviral Nucleoside Inhibitors