Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Relationship between acute improvement in left ventricular function to 6-month outcomes after cardiac
Luis A Pires1, Stefano Ghio, Eugene S Chung
1Heart Rhythm Center, St John Hospital and Medical, Moross, Detroit, MI 48236, USA. luis.pires@stjohn.org
Insights
An acute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac resynchronization therapy does not predict long-term heart failure outcomes. However, this acute response in patients with smaller left ventricular volumes may offer insights into CRT mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a treatment for heart failure (HF).
- The long-term impact of acute improvements in left ventricular (LV) function following CRT is not well understood.
- Predicting CRT response is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the significance of acute improvements in LV function after CRT.
- To determine if an acute increase in LV ejection fraction (EF) predicts 6-month clinical outcomes and reverse remodeling.
- To explore potential mechanisms underlying CRT benefits.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of CRT-treated patients from the PROSPECT trial.
- Comparison of 6-month clinical composite score (CCS) and LV end-systolic volume (ESV) reduction rates.
- Stratification based on acute (≥15%) increase in LV ejection fraction (EF) post-CRT.
Main Results:
- 19.7% of patients showed an acute increase in LVEF; these patients had lower baseline EF and smaller LV volumes.
- At 6 months, CCS improvement (70.5% vs. 69.5%) and LVESV reduction (57.1% vs. 54.9%) response rates were similar between groups.
- An acute LVEF increase did not predict 6-month CRT effects on patient outcomes or LV reverse remodeling.
Conclusions:
- An acute significant increase in LVEF following CRT does not reliably predict long-term clinical benefit or reverse remodeling.
- The findings suggest that acute functional response in patients with smaller LV volumes may offer insights into CRT's mechanisms of action.
- Further research is needed to fully elucidate the factors influencing long-term CRT efficacy.
Abstract:
The long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-induced acute improvement in left ventricular (LV) function is largely unknown. The goal of this study was to evaluate the significance of acute improvement in LV function resulting from CRT in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). The authors compared 6-month clinical composite score (CCS) and LV end-systolic (ESV) reduction (≥15% from baseline) response rates of CRT-treated patients enrolled in the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial who showed an acute increase (≥15% from baseline) in LV ejection fraction (EF) vs those who did not show a similar change in EF. Of the 396 patients who had pre-implant and post-implant EF measurements, 78 (19.7%) had an increase in EF and 318 (80.3%) did not. Acute reduction of mitral regurgitation by at least one grade occurred in 26% and 23% of patients with and without an acute increase in EF, respectively. Patients with an acute increase in EF had significantly lower baseline EF and smaller LV volumes but otherwise similar characteristics. At 6 months, LVEF and LV volumes were significantly higher and lower in the increased EF group, respectively; however, CCS improvement (70.5% vs 69.5%) and LVESV reduction (57.1% vs 54.9%) response rates were comparable in the two groups. An acute ≥15% increase in LVEF with CRT does not predict 6-month effects of CRT on patient outcomes or LV reverse remodeling. That such findings occur in patients with smaller LV volumes, however, may provide additional insight into the mechanisms responsible for CRT-induced long-term improvement in LV function and clinical benefit.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

