Related Experiment Videos
Routine serial echocardiography in systolic heart failure: is it time for the heart failure guidelines to change?
Kathy Hebert1, Francisco Yuri Bulcao Macedo, Patrick Trahan
1Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136, USA. khebert1@gmail.com
Insights
Clinician-assessed symptoms via New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification are unreliable for tracking systolic heart failure (HF) progression. Echocardiography-measured ejection fraction (EF) provides more accurate prognostic data for guiding HF therapy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Systolic heart failure (HF) management relies on accurate patient status assessment.
- Serial echocardiography is considered for routine use in HF guidelines.
- The reliability of clinician-assessed symptoms (NYHA class) versus objective measures needs evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the reliability of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification with echocardiography-measured ejection fraction (EF) in assessing systolic heart failure (HF) prognosis.
- To provide objective evidence for informing American College of Cardiology Heart Failure Guidelines regarding serial echocardiography.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 256 patients with systolic HF (EF ≤40%) in an HF disease management program.
- Patients underwent at least two annual echocardiograms.
- Clinician-assessed NYHA functional classification was compared with EF changes measured by echocardiography.
Main Results:
- Only 33.5% of patients were correctly classified by NYHA class compared to echocardiographic findings.
- Patients with no change in NYHA class between echocardiograms exhibited the lowest survival rates.
- NYHA classification showed significant discordance with objective echocardiographic data.
Conclusions:
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification is not always a reliable tool for assessing prognosis in systolic heart failure (HF).
- Objective measures like ejection fraction (EF) from echocardiography are crucial for evaluating patient status and guiding medical therapy in HF.
- Findings support the need for objective assessments in HF management and guideline development.
Abstract:
The authors sought to obtain objective evidence for impacting the American College of Cardiology Heart Failure Guidelines for the routine use of serial echocardiography by assessing the reliability of the use of clinician-assessed patient symptoms and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification compared with ejection fraction (EF) measured by echocardiography. A prospective study in 256 patients with systolic heart failure (HF) enrolled into an HF disease management program with EF ≤40% and at least 2 annual echocardiograms were included. Only 86 of 256 (33.5%) patients were correctly classified by NYHA class as showing improvement, no change, or deterioration as compared with echocardiographic assessments. Patients whose NYHA class showed no change between echocardiograms had the lowest survival rate. Quantification in patient's status with NYHA classification is not always a reliable assessment to evaluate prognosis and guide medical therapy for patients with systolic HF.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions