Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A typology of useful evidence: approaches to increase the practical value of intervention research.

BMC medical research methodology·2020
Same author

Building a National Culture of Health: Background, Action Framework, Measures, and Next Steps.

Rand health quarterly·2017
Same author

Cross-Sector Collaborations And Partnerships: Essential Ingredients To Help Shape Health And Well-Being.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2016
Same author

Strengthening Integration Of Health Services And Systems.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2016
Same author

Demystifying theory and its use in improvement.

BMJ quality & safety·2015
Same author

Rationale for New York City's regulations on nutrition, physical activity, and screen time in early child care centers.

Preventing chronic disease·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Reconciling complexity and classification in quality improvement research.

Laura Leviton1

  • 1The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Route 1 and College Road East, Box 2316, Princeton, NJ 08543-2316, USA. llevito@rwjf.org

BMJ Quality & Safety
|April 1, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Classifying quality improvement (QI) research helps overcome system complexity. This approach aids in building more generalizable knowledge from QI initiatives.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare research
  • Health systems science
  • Implementation science

Background:

  • Quality improvement (QI) research faces challenges due to complex healthcare systems and varied contexts.
  • Lack of standardized classification hinders the accumulation of generalizable QI knowledge.
  • Existing QI research often struggles with reproducibility and scalability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel classification system for quality improvement (QI) research.
  • To address the complexity and contextual variability in QI research.
  • To enhance the generalizability and impact of QI findings.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing QI classification frameworks.
  • Development of a multi-dimensional classification schema for QI interventions.
  • Expert consensus validation of the proposed classification system.

Main Results:

  • A proposed classification system categorizing QI research based on key dimensions.
  • Demonstration of how the classification can be applied to existing QI studies.
  • Identification of common patterns and variations in QI approaches.

Conclusions:

  • A robust QI classification system can mitigate challenges posed by system complexity.
  • Improved classification facilitates knowledge synthesis and the development of evidence-based QI strategies.
  • This framework supports more effective and generalizable quality improvement in healthcare.