Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mobility Function and Aperiodic Electrocortical Activity in Younger and Older Adults.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Mood and Age Predict Cognitive Complaints in Memory Clinic Patients: A Machine-Learning and Linear Modeling Approach.

European journal of neurology·2026
Same author

A cohort intervention to boost space health grant funding success for researchers from historically minoritized groups: 2022-2023.

NPJ microgravity·2026
Same author

Case study: dose-dependent internal jugular vein response to lower body negative pressure in microgravity quantified by the flow directionality index.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2026
Same author

The effects of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> on brain and ocular signal intensity with intravenous contrast MRI.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Neurophysiological metrics of surprise during locomotor uncertainty.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

When "Noise" Isn't Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS).

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

From discovery to translation: charting a course for the <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Neuromodulatory Strategies Overcome Multiple Inevitable Impairments of Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Acute Fentanyl Toxicity:From Opioid-Induced to Hypoxia-Mediated Pathophysiology.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation.

Bryan L Benson1, Joaquin A Anguera, Rachael D Seidler

  • 1School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|April 1, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Explicit strategies in sensorimotor adaptation initially reduce errors but increase variability. While performance equalizes later, underlying learning mechanisms differ, with explicit strategies potentially inhibiting implicit processes.

More Related Videos

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Learning
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Sensorimotor adaptation is often viewed as implicit learning.
  • Explicit awareness of perturbations can enhance learning.
  • Awareness is typically assessed only after learning concludes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the early and late effects of explicit strategies on sensorimotor adaptation.
  • To compare the underlying learning mechanisms between explicit and implicit adaptation.
  • To examine how explicit strategies modulate implicit recalibration.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were assigned to either an explicit spatial strategy group or a control group.
  • Movement errors, trial-to-trial variability, and reaction times were measured.
  • Catch trials were used to differentiate between explicit and implicit learning components.

Main Results:

  • Explicit instructions initially reduced movement errors but increased variability and reaction time.
  • Late in adaptation, performance was similar across groups, but underlying mechanisms differed.
  • The explicit group showed reduced implicit recalibration and aftereffects compared to the control group.

Conclusions:

  • Explicit strategies influence sensorimotor adaptation by altering error processing and potentially inhibiting implicit learning.
  • The interplay between explicit and implicit mechanisms is crucial for understanding motor learning.
  • Future research should explore the neural basis of this explicit-implicit interaction.