Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
Sensitivity of postplanning target and OAR coverage estimates to dosimetric margin distribution sampling parameters
Huijun Xu1, J James Gordon, Jeffrey V Siebers
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA. xuh2@vcu.edu
Optimizing dosimetric margin distribution (DMD) sampling improves prostate cancer treatment accuracy. Finer sampling (10 degrees, 0.5 mm) ensures reliable coverage estimates for targets and organs-at-risk, enhancing treatment planning.
Area of Science:
- Radiation oncology
- Medical physics
- Image-guided therapy
Background:
- Dosimetric margin (DM) and dosimetric margin distribution (DMD) are crucial for accounting for geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy.
- Coverage (Q) quantifies the probability of achieving desired dose metrics, essential for post-planning evaluation of treatment plans.
- Accurate coverage estimation is vital as static margins may not fully capture the impact of interfraction and intrafraction uncertainties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate coverage probabilities for 28 prostate cancer treatment plans.
- To determine optimal dosimetric margin distribution (DMD) sampling parameters for accurate post-planning coverage estimates.
- To assess the impact of sampling techniques (angular vs. isotropic) on coverage accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Interfraction setup uncertainties were simulated for 28 prostate cancer plans (79.2 Gy prescribed dose, 10 mm CTV-to-PTV margin).
- Dosimetric margins for CTV, bladder, and rectum were calculated using angular and isotropic sampling techniques with varying angular intervals (ω) and radial step sizes (δ).
- Coverage estimation accuracy (ΔQ) was quantified as a function of sampling parameters and technique.
Main Results:
- Coverage estimation accuracy is dependent on sampling parameters (ω, δ) and technique.
- Achieving target ΔQ < 1% and OAR ΔQ < 3% requires ω = 20°, δ = 1 mm.
- Higher accuracy (target ΔQ < 0.5%, OAR ΔQ ≈ 1%) is obtained with ω = 10°, δ = 0.5 mm.
- Isotropic sampling demonstrated better accuracy than fixed angular sampling as the number of sampling points decreased.
Conclusions:
- Post-planning coverage estimates are essential for accurate assessment of geometric uncertainties.
- Finer sampling of the dosimetric margin distribution (DMD) leads to more precise coverage evaluations.
- DMD sampling with ω = 10° and δ = 0.5 mm is recommended for adequate planning purposes in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Margin of Error
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

