Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026
06:58
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Effect of reminders on mitigating participation bias in a case-control study
Clarence C Tam1, Craig D Higgins, Laura C Rodrigues
1Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. clarence.tam@lshtm.ac.uk
BMC Medical Research Methodology
|April 2, 2011
Summary
Using reminders in health studies boosts participation and statistical power. Despite differences in responders, a two-reminder strategy did not introduce systematic bias in Campylobacter enteritis research.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Public Health Research
Background:
- Health studies often use incentives and reminders to boost participation.
- Limited evidence exists on the quantitative impact of these strategies on study outcomes.
- A case-control study on Campylobacter enteritis in England examined a two-reminder strategy for control recruitment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of a two-reminder strategy in recruiting controls for a health study.
- To evaluate the quantitative effect of recruitment strategies on study results.
- To determine if intensive reminders introduce bias in epidemiological research.
Main Methods:
- Compared sociodemographic characteristics of participants versus non-participants.
- Analyzed odds ratio estimates for risk factors across different mailing waves.
- Assessed potential bias introduced by varying response times.
Main Results:
- Non-participants were more likely to be male, younger, and from deprived areas.
- Early responders differed demographically (more females, older, less deprived areas).
- Little evidence of systematic bias was found when using data solely from early responders.
Conclusions:
- The primary benefit of using reminders was increased statistical power due to a larger sample size.
- Reminder strategies can enhance participation without necessarily compromising study integrity.
- Further research may quantify the precise impact of different recruitment strategies on study power and bias.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
01:11Blinding
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
02:07Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
01:27Halo Effect
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...