Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings01:29

Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings

Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving technique for managing acute respiratory failure and other respiratory complications. The process involves using a machine known as a ventilator to supply oxygen to the lungs and assist in removing carbon dioxide. It serves as a bridge to long-term mechanical ventilation or a temporary measure until ventilatory support is discontinued. The ventilator can maintain this function for a prolonged period, providing critical support for patients until they can...
Ventilatory Modes01:14

Ventilatory Modes

Mechanical ventilators are life-saving devices that support or replace spontaneous breathing. They deliver breaths to patients through varying methods known as ventilator modes. Understanding these modes is critical for healthcare providers managing patients with respiratory failure.
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation01:23

Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) are essential methods in respiratory care. These ventilation techniques offer unique benefits for patients with various respiratory conditions, providing adequate support without requiring intubation. Let's explore how each method is crucial in improving patient outcomes and enhancing respiratory therapy.
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation01:23

Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation

Ventilators are essential medical equipment used to aid patients with respiratory difficulties. Their primary function is to assist or replace spontaneous breathing by providing mechanical ventilation. There are two general classes of mechanical ventilators: negative-pressure and positive-pressure ventilators.
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation01:19

Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation

Besides the pressure difference between the external environment and the lungs, the airflow rate and ease of pulmonary ventilation are also influenced by three other factors: surface tension of the fluid in the alveoli, compliance of the lungs, and airway resistance.
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate01:20

Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate

Assessment of Ventilation
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of a New Device for Clearing Secretions From Lower Airways.

Respiratory care·2025
Same author

Accelerometer-based estimation of respiratory rate using principal component analysis and autocorrelation.

Physiological measurement·2025
Same author

Glucosafe 2-A new tool for nutritional management and insulin-therapy in the intensive care unit: Randomized controlled study (the Glucosafe 2 protocol).

PloS one·2025
Same author

A randomized control trial evaluating the advice of a physiological-model/digital twin-based decision support system on mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Frontiers in medicine·2024
Same author

Evaluation of decision support to wean patients from mechanical ventilation in intensive care: a prospective study reporting clinical and physiological outcomes.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·2024
Same author

The use of venous blood gas in assessing arterial acid-base and oxygenation status - an analysis of aggregated data from multiple studies evaluating the venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC) method.

Expert review of respiratory medicine·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

3D Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Respiratory Motion in Mechanically Ventilated Mice and Rats
08:22

3D Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Respiratory Motion in Mechanically Ventilated Mice and Rats

Published on: September 19, 2025

Variability of preference toward mechanical ventilator settings: a model-based behavioral analysis.

Charlotte Allerød1, Dan S Karbing, Per Thorgaard

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark. c.allerod@post.tele.dk

Journal of Critical Care
|April 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Danish clinicians showed significant disagreement on optimal ventilator settings for simulated patients. Their opinions on advice from peers and decision support systems were often poor, highlighting a need for consensus in mechanical ventilation management.

More Related Videos

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
12:09

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics

Published on: April 19, 2024

A Structured Approach to Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Rats
05:05

A Structured Approach to Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Rats

Published on: July 18, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

3D Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Respiratory Motion in Mechanically Ventilated Mice and Rats
08:22

3D Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Respiratory Motion in Mechanically Ventilated Mice and Rats

Published on: September 19, 2025

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
12:09

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics

Published on: April 19, 2024

A Structured Approach to Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Rats
05:05

A Structured Approach to Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Rats

Published on: July 18, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Respiratory Therapy
  • Clinical Decision Support

Background:

  • Mechanical ventilation requires precise settings for optimal patient outcomes.
  • Standardized patient models are crucial for objective evaluation of clinical opinions.
  • Variability in clinical judgment can impact mechanical ventilation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess Danish clinicians' perspectives on ventilator settings.
  • To utilize standardized model-simulated patients for consistent data presentation.
  • To compare clinician opinions with a computerized decision support system's recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • Ten intensive care clinicians and a decision support system provided ventilator setting suggestions (respiratory frequency, tidal volume, FiO2).
  • Suggestions were made for 10 standardized model-simulated patient cases.
  • Clinicians evaluated 110 suggestions via ranking and classification.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences (P < .005) were observed in clinicians' preferred ventilator settings and simulated physiological outcomes.
  • Clinicians deemed advice from peers and the decision support system unacceptable in 33% of cases and good in only 21%.
  • Lack of consensus was evident in the ranking procedure for best and worst advice.

Conclusions:

  • Substantial disagreement exists among clinicians regarding appropriate ventilator settings (FiO2, Vt, f).
  • Computerized decision support systems and peer advice were often poorly regarded by clinicians.
  • Standardized models revealed significant inter-clinician variability in mechanical ventilation recommendations.