The Simpson's paradox unraveled

Miguel A Hernán1, David Clayton, Niels Keiding

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, MA 02115, USA. miguel_hernan@post.havard.edu

Summary

Simpson's paradox, a statistical anomaly, can be resolved by incorporating causal context and subject-matter knowledge into analysis. Ignoring this context can lead to analytical errors and paradoxical findings.

Related Concept Videos

Simpson's Rule II01:28

Simpson's Rule II

In warehouse roofing applications, corrugated or curved metal sheets are commonly used to improve structural strength, water drainage, and ventilation efficiency. To accurately estimate material requirements and optimize design parameters, engineers must determine the curved surface area of these sheets. Because the sheet profiles often repeat smoothly along their length, they can be effectively approximated by parabolic curves, enabling the use of numerical integration techniques for area...
Simpson's Rule I01:26

Simpson's Rule I

Simpson’s Rule is a numerical integration method used to approximate the value of a definite integral when an exact antiderivative is difficult or impossible to obtain. The method estimates area by fitting a unique parabola through three equally spaced points on a curve and then integrating the resulting quadratic function over the interval. By using only a small number of sampled values, Simpson’s Rule provides an accurate approximation for many smoothly varying functions.A common practical...
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Schemas01:42

Schemas

A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...