Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Mapping: A New Methodology to Elucidate Global Structural Features
Published on: March 16, 2022
Structural comparison of substrate entry gate for rhomboid intramembrane peptidases
Christelle Lazareno-Saez1, Cory L Brooks, M Joanne Lemieux
1School of Molecular & Systems Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Membrane Protein Research Group, Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Rhomboid enzymes cleave membrane proteins to release signals, with disruptions linked to disease. Structural comparisons of E. coli and H. influenzae rhomboids reveal key differences in substrate gate regions, impacting function.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Structural Biology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Rhomboids are intramembrane serine peptidases crucial for releasing signaling molecules from integral membrane proteins.
- Disruptions in rhomboid-mediated signaling are implicated in various human diseases.
- Understanding rhomboid structure is key to elucidating their function and therapeutic potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the crystal structures of E. coli GlpG (ecGlpG) and H. influenzae GlpG (hiGlpG) rhomboids.
- To identify mobile elements responsible for substrate docking and entry gate formation.
- To analyze structural variations and their functional implications.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of published crystal structures of ecGlpG and hiGlpG.
- Examination of transmembrane helix and loop conformations, particularly helix 5, loop 5, and loop 4.
- Analysis of hydrophobic interactions within key structural regions.
Main Results:
- Distinct conformations of loop 5 and helix 5 were observed in ecGlpG, suggesting a dynamic substrate entry gate.
- Comparison with hiGlpG revealed variations in loop 5 and helix 5, alongside differences in loop 4.
- Loop 4 appears conserved and may function as a stable anchor for the substrate gate.
Conclusions:
- Structural variations in rhomboid proteases, particularly in the substrate entry gate, influence their function.
- Loop 4 may serve as a conserved anchoring region, stabilizing the dynamic substrate gate.
- These findings provide insights into rhomboid regulation and potential drug target identification.
Related Concept Videos
Insertion of Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER
Integral transmembrane proteins possess transmembrane and extra membrane domains. The transmembrane domains are primarily made of 20-25 hydrophobic amino acids arranged in a helical secondary confirmation. These...
Insertion of Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER
The multipass transmembrane proteins are the type IV integral membrane proteins with multiple topogenic sequences determining their spatial arrangement in the ER membrane. Nearly all multipass proteins lack a cleavable signal sequence and use...
Membrane Asymmetry Regulating Transporters
Flippase
Eukaryotic flippases are type-IV P-type ATPases or P4-ATPases belonging to P-type ATPase family proteins that are membrane-bound pumps involved in the ATP-mediated transport of ions and molecules across the membrane. Flippases flip specific phospholipids from the outer to the inner leaflet of a membrane. All P4-ATPases have one...
Protein Translocation Machinery on the ER Membrane
Sec61 protein conducting channel
In eukaryotes, the translocon complex comprises a core heterotrimeric translocator channel called the Sec61 complex. This channel includes three transmembrane proteins, Sec61α, Sec61β, and Sec61γ, and is the largest subunit of the translocon complex.
Directing Proteins to the Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum
Post-translational Translocation of Proteins to the RER
Targeting proteins to the ER
Hsp40 and Hsp70 chaperone molecules bind the translated proteins in the cytosol to prevent their folding. The chaperone binding helps to keep the signal...

