Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026
03:30
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy with Uterine Preservation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: October 25, 2024
Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes
Elizabeth J Geller1, Brent A Parnell, Gena C Dunivan
1Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7570, USA. egeller@med.unc.edu
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
|April 5, 2011
Summary
Robotic sacrocolpopexy significantly improves pelvic floor function and support one year after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Patients experienced durable benefits, including maintained sexual function and a low rate of complications.
Area of Science:
- Urogynecology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) significantly impacts women's quality of life.
- Robotic sacrocolpopexy is a surgical option for advanced POP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate pelvic floor function and support one year after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
- To assess long-term surgical outcomes, including failures and complications.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort analysis of women with advanced POP undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy.
- Pelvic floor function assessed via validated questionnaires (PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, PISQ-12).
- Anatomic support evaluated using POP-Q staging; surgical outcomes tracked via physical examination.
Main Results:
- Significant improvements in pelvic floor function (PFDI-20, PFIQ-7) and pelvic support (POP-Q Ba, C) were observed one year post-surgery.
- Anatomic cure for vault prolapse was 100% at one year.
- Sexual function remained stable; mesh exposures and subsequent prolapse surgeries occurred in a small percentage of patients.
Conclusions:
- Robotic sacrocolpopexy offers durable improvements in pelvic floor function and support.
- The procedure demonstrates high rates of sexual function and acceptable complication rates at one year.
