Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction

Robert O Bonow1, Gerald Maurer, Kerry L Lee

  • 1Center for Cardiovascular Innovation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1006, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. r-bonow@northwestern.edu

Insights

Assessing myocardial viability did not identify patients who benefit from coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). While viable myocardium suggested better survival, this was not statistically significant after adjustments, and CABG showed no differential benefit.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Myocardial viability assessment aims to identify patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who may benefit from coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG).
  • The clinical efficacy of using myocardial viability assessment to guide CABG decisions remains uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate whether the assessment of myocardial viability can identify patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who experience a survival benefit from CABG compared to medical therapy alone.

Main Methods:

  • A substudy of the STICH trial enrolled patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.
  • Myocardial viability was assessed using single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), dobutamine echocardiography, or both.
  • Patients were randomized to medical therapy with or without CABG.

Main Results:

  • Among 601 patients with assessed myocardial viability, 298 received CABG plus medical therapy and 303 received medical therapy alone.
  • Patients with viable myocardium showed a trend towards lower mortality (37%) compared to those without (51%), but this was not significant after adjustment (P=0.21).
  • No significant interaction was found between viability status and the survival benefit of CABG (P=0.53).

Conclusions:

  • Myocardial viability assessment did not identify patients who would gain a differential survival benefit from CABG over medical therapy.
  • The presence of viable myocardium was not a significant predictor of survival benefit from CABG in this patient cohort.
  • Further research is needed to clarify the role of myocardial viability assessment in guiding revascularization decisions.
Abstract