Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction
Robert O Bonow1, Gerald Maurer, Kerry L Lee
1Center for Cardiovascular Innovation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1006, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. r-bonow@northwestern.edu
Insights
Assessing myocardial viability did not identify patients who benefit from coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). While viable myocardium suggested better survival, this was not statistically significant after adjustments, and CABG showed no differential benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Myocardial viability assessment aims to identify patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who may benefit from coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- The clinical efficacy of using myocardial viability assessment to guide CABG decisions remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether the assessment of myocardial viability can identify patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who experience a survival benefit from CABG compared to medical therapy alone.
Main Methods:
- A substudy of the STICH trial enrolled patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.
- Myocardial viability was assessed using single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), dobutamine echocardiography, or both.
- Patients were randomized to medical therapy with or without CABG.
Main Results:
- Among 601 patients with assessed myocardial viability, 298 received CABG plus medical therapy and 303 received medical therapy alone.
- Patients with viable myocardium showed a trend towards lower mortality (37%) compared to those without (51%), but this was not significant after adjustment (P=0.21).
- No significant interaction was found between viability status and the survival benefit of CABG (P=0.53).
Conclusions:
- Myocardial viability assessment did not identify patients who would gain a differential survival benefit from CABG over medical therapy.
- The presence of viable myocardium was not a significant predictor of survival benefit from CABG in this patient cohort.
- Further research is needed to clarify the role of myocardial viability assessment in guiding revascularization decisions.
Background:
The assessment of myocardial viability has been used to identify patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction in whom coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) will provide a survival benefit. However, the efficacy of this approach is uncertain.
Methods:
In a substudy of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who were enrolled in a randomized trial of medical therapy with or without CABG, we used single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), dobutamine echocardiography, or both to assess myocardial viability on the basis of prespecified thresholds.
Results:
Among the 1212 patients enrolled in the randomized trial, 601 underwent assessment of myocardial viability. Of these patients, we randomly assigned 298 to receive medical therapy plus CABG and 303 to receive medical therapy alone. A total of 178 of 487 patients with viable myocardium (37%) and 58 of 114 patients without viable myocardium (51%) died (hazard ratio for death among patients with viable myocardium, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 0.86; P=0.003). However, after adjustment for other baseline variables, this association with mortality was not significant (P=0.21). There was no significant interaction between viability status and treatment assignment with respect to mortality (P=0.53).
Conclusions:
The presence of viable myocardium was associated with a greater likelihood of survival in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, but this relationship was not significant after adjustment for other baseline variables. The assessment of myocardial viability did not identify patients with a differential survival benefit from CABG, as compared with medical therapy alone. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; STICH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023595.).
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

