Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Run Charts

Run Charts

Run charts serve as an essential instrument for visualizing the performance of various processes over time, enabling the identification of trends and patterns crucial for quality improvement. These charts map out a series of data points chronologically, offering insights into the stability and efficiency of a process. A run chart's creation involves plotting data points on a graph, with the time intervals on the horizontal axis and the specific measurements on the vertical axis. For example,...

Interpreting Run Charts

Interpreting Run Charts

Run charts, essentially line graphs plotted over time, serve as fundamental yet effective tools for process analysis. They chronicle data sequentially, facilitating the identification of trends, shifts, or cyclical movements. This graphical representation is instrumental in determining whether a process is stable or exhibits signs of potential instability indicative of special cause variation. In the healthcare domain, run charts depict infection rates over time, enabling hospitals to monitor...

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

Interpreting R Charts

Interpreting R Charts

R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum values—of a sample...

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Wrong-Patient Blood Transfusion Error: Leveraging Technology to Overcome Human Error in Intraoperative Blood Component Administration.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2018

Same author

Sensor-based measurement of critical care nursing workload: Unobtrusive measures of nursing activity complement traditional task and patient level indicators of workload to predict perceived exertion.

PloS one·2018

Same author

Developing and Testing a Chart Abstraction Tool for ICU Quality Measurement.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2018

Same author

Evaluation of a Measurement System to Assess ICU Team Performance.

Critical care medicine·2018

Same author

In Reply to Khoo and Teo.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2018

Same author

Intensive care unit providers more quickly and accurately assess risk of multiple harms using an engineered safety display.

Health informatics journal·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis & commentary: A road map for improving the performance of performance measures.

Peter J Pronovost¹, Richard Lilford

¹Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Health Affairs (Project Hope)

|April 8, 2011

Summary

Improving healthcare quality relies on performance measures, but their validity is debated. Overcoming this deadlock requires advancing the science of quality measurement for better accountability and outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Health Services Research
Quality Improvement Science
Healthcare Policy

Background:

The increasing use of healthcare performance measures aims to improve quality and ensure provider accountability.
Current quality measurement science faces challenges, with experts questioning data validity, particularly hospital claims data.
A gap exists between scientific scrutiny and the demand for performance evidence from policymakers, payers, and the public.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss the current challenges and impasses in the field of healthcare quality measurement.
To identify necessary advancements to overcome existing limitations in quality measurement science.

Main Methods:

Literature review and synthesis of current debates in healthcare quality measurement.
Analysis of the tension between scientific validity concerns and policy demands for performance data.

Main Results:

Significant tension exists regarding the scientific validity and capabilities of current healthcare performance measures.
Concerns about data sources, such as hospital claims, undermine confidence in quality assessments.
Policy makers, payers, and the public increasingly demand evidence of healthcare performance.

Conclusions:

The field of quality measurement is at an impasse due to unresolved scientific validity issues.
Advancing the science of quality measurement is crucial to bridge the gap between data scrutiny and performance accountability.
Future efforts must focus on developing robust and valid methods for assessing healthcare quality.