Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Using Simulation Models to Train Clinicians in the Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound
Published on: August 9, 2024
Comparing PDA- and paper-based evaluation of the clinical skills of third-year students
Dario M Torre1, Robert Treat, Steven Durning
1University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Shadyside, Pittsburgh, Penn 15232, USA. torred@upmc.edu
Background:
The mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) is used to assess medical students' clinical skills during medicine clerkships.
Purpose:
To evaluate reliability, feasibility, and user satisfaction of a paper vs PDA-based mini-CEX in a third-year medicine clerkship.
Methods:
The mini-CEX was reformatted as a PDA-based rating form for a medicine clerkship over 1 year. Faculty and residents were instructed to use either paper-based or the PDA form to assess clinical skills of students. A 9-point Likert scale was used to assess clinical skills and user satisfaction. Independent t-tests were used to assess differences between delivery formats.
Findings:
Nearly all (98%) students completed 2 Mini-CEXs, with 275 PDA- and 101 paper-based records performed. Form reliability (Cronbach alpha) exceeded 0.9 for both. Overall resident satisfaction scores with the PDA form (7.2 +/- 1.8) were higher (P = 0.01) than the paper-based form (6.6/1.7). However, faculty satisfaction scores with the PDA form (6.9 +/- 1.6) were significantly lower (P = 0.01) than the paper form (7.6 +/- 1.5). Mean scores for all 7 clinical competencies of PDA format (7.9 +/- 0.9) were higher than the paper-based (7.6 +/- 1.1) version (P = .01). Mean observation (26 min; +/- 16) and feedback time (11 min +/- 8) were longer (both P < .05) with PDA-based form compared to the paper version (22 min +/- 14);(8.7 +/- 6.3). Student and evaluator satisfaction ratings were not significantly different by form.
Conclusions:
Both PDA- and paper-based mini-CEX delivery was acceptable to evaluators and students with both formats demonstrating high reliability. However, because evaluators' satisfaction, observation, and feedback time differed by form, further studies are needed to determine factors influencing rating variability.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
