Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differential Development of Object and Location Processing is a Critical Factor to a Child's Passing or Failing Explicit False-Belief Tasks.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Music-selective cortex is sensitive to structure in both pitch and time.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Lip-reading and eye-gaze discrimination are functionally lateralized across the left and right posterior superior temporal sulci.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Distinct mechanisms of contextual modulation for dynamic natural scenes in motion- and scene-selective cortex.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Conniving With Continuations: Representing Goals in a Domain-Specific Language of Thought.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Real-Time, Inline Quantitative MRI Enabled by Scanner-Integrated Machine Learning: A Proof of Principle With NODDI.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions.

David Pitcher1, Daniel D Dilks, Rebecca R Saxe

  • 1McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. dpitcher@mit.edu

Neuroimage
|April 9, 2011
PubMed
Summary

The superior temporal sulcus (STS) processes dynamic faces, while the fusiform face area (FFA) handles static faces. This study reveals distinct functional roles for different brain regions in face perception.

More Related Videos

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
08:36

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Published on: March 21, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
08:36

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Published on: March 21, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Multiple face-selective regions exist in the human cortex, but their specific functions remain unclear.
  • A leading hypothesis posits that superior temporal sulcus (STS) regions process dynamic facial information, while the fusiform face area (FFA) processes static facial properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly test the hypothesis of functional specialization between STS and FFA in processing dynamic versus static facial information.
  • To investigate the differential responses of face-selective brain regions to dynamic and static face stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized neuroimaging techniques to measure brain responses.
  • Compared the magnitude of neural responses in identified face-selective regions (FFA, OFA, pSTS, aSTS, pcSTS) to both dynamic (movies) and static (images) face stimuli.
  • Assessed responses to moving faces versus moving bodies to confirm stimulus specificity.

Main Results:

  • The right FFA and right occipital face area (OFA) showed no significant difference in response to dynamic versus static faces.
  • The right posterior STS (pSTS) responded significantly more (nearly threefold) to dynamic faces than static faces.
  • The right anterior STS (aSTS) responded to dynamic faces exclusively, and both pSTS and aSTS showed preferential responses to moving faces over moving bodies.

Conclusions:

  • Demonstrates a clear functional dissociation in face processing, with pSTS and aSTS specializing in dynamic facial information, unlike FFA, OFA, and pcSTS.
  • Provides crucial insights into the specialized roles of different face-selective cortical regions in perceiving dynamic facial cues.