Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expanded Genomic Surveillance and Seasonal Comparisons of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections in Minnesota, USA, 2023-2025.

Influenza and other respiratory viruses·2026
Same author

Comparison of Independent Analyses of Identical Image Sets Reveals Significant Analyst-to-Analyst Variability.

Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT·2025
Same author

Loneliness and Emotional and Externalizing Problems in Early Adolescence: Moderating and Mediating Effects of Coping Skills.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

<i>Nurturing Creativity whilst Caring</i>: Participatory Action Research with family carers and a Recovery College.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

Light Microscopy as a Tool to Detect Apoptosis and Other Cellular Changes and Damage.

Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT·2025
Same author

From Federal Policy to Bedside Care: A Canadian Perspective on Key Considerations for Nurse Executive Action for AI Adoption - A Commentary.

Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging
04:54

A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging

Published on: June 16, 2023

Quality assurance testing for modern optical imaging systems.

Robert F Stack1, Carol J Bayles, Anne-Marie Girard

  • 1Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, P.O. Box 509, Albany, NY 12201, USA.

Microscopy and Microanalysis : the Official Journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada
|April 12, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Microscope performance is now assessed using image-based tests, not just visual inspection. This study established global standards for illumination stability, color alignment, and field uniformity to ensure reliable imaging data.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (oSLO) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
12:22

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (oSLO) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Published on: August 4, 2018

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging
04:54

A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging

Published on: June 16, 2023

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (oSLO) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
12:22

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (oSLO) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Published on: August 4, 2018

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Microscopy
  • Optical Engineering
  • Quantitative Imaging

Background:

  • Traditional visual inspection of microscope performance is insufficient for modern quantitative imaging.
  • Ensuring data uniformity and quantifiability across instruments and over time is critical for research and funding.
  • Key performance indicators include laser stability, uniform illumination, and precise color alignment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish objective, image-based performance standards for light microscopes.
  • To assess the current state of global microscope performance.
  • To provide a framework for maintaining optimal instrument conditions in core facilities.

Main Methods:

  • A worldwide study using three image-based tests: long/short-term illumination stability, co-registration of signals across wavelengths, and field illumination uniformity.
  • Defined performance benchmarks: illumination power deviation (10% long-term, 3% short-term), co-registration error (<1 pixel), and field uniformity deviation (10% horizontal, 20% diagonal).

Main Results:

  • Established current global microscope performance levels through standardized testing.
  • Quantified deviations in illumination stability, wavelength co-registration, and field uniformity.
  • Identified specific thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable instrument performance.

Conclusions:

  • Developed simple, efficient, and robust tests for assessing microscope performance.
  • Defined cross-platform standards to improve the validity of quantitative measurements.
  • Aimed to assist core facilities in maintaining instrument performance and ensuring data reproducibility.