Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026
11:21
Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
Proximal humeral fracture classification systems revisited
Addie Majed1, Iain Macleod, Anthony M J Bull
1Division of Surgery Oncology Reproductive Medicine and Anaesthetics, Imperial College London, UK. a.majed@imperial.ac.uk
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
|April 13, 2011
Summary
Current proximal humeral fracture classification systems show poor reliability among surgeons. The Codman-Hertel system demonstrated the highest interobserver agreement, suggesting it is the most comprehensive for these complex injuries.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Radiology
- Medical imaging
Background:
- Proximal humeral fractures are complex injuries requiring accurate classification for effective treatment.
- Existing classification systems may lack sufficient reliability for clinical decision-making.
- 3D modeling from CT scans offers a novel approach to evaluating fracture classification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of four proximal humeral fracture classification systems.
- To determine if 3D rapid sequence prototyping models improve classification accuracy.
- To identify the most reliable classification system for complex proximal humeral fractures.
Main Methods:
- 96 complex proximal humeral fractures were analyzed using 3D rapid sequence prototyping models derived from CT scans.
- Four independent senior surgeons classified fractures using Neer, AO, Codman-Hertel, and Resch classification systems.
- Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were assessed using kappa (κ) coefficient values.
Main Results:
- Interobserver reliability κ values ranged from 0.11 (AO) to 0.44 (Codman-Hertel), indicating slight to moderate agreement.
- The Codman-Hertel system showed the highest interobserver reliability (κ=0.44).
- Neer and AO systems demonstrated low reliability for classifying three-part fractures.
Conclusions:
- Current proximal humeral fracture classification systems exhibit poor interobserver reliability, hindering clinical management and research.
- The Codman-Hertel classification system appears to be the most reliable and comprehensive among those studied.
- Further refinement of classification systems, like Resch's, may improve accuracy for specific fracture characteristics.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Fractures: Bone Repair
Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
01:19Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus
The upper limb consists of the arm, forearm, wrist, and hand bones. The humerus is the single bone of the upper arm region. Proximally, it has a large, spherical, smooth head that articulates with the glenoid cavity of the scapula to form the glenohumeral or shoulder joint. The margin of the head is the anatomical neck, a residual epiphyseal plate. Laterally it extends to form bony projections called the greater tubercle and the lesser tubercle. Next to the tubercles is the surgical neck, a...
01:18Classification of Bones
The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The long...
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The long...
01:09Functional Classification of Joints
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...