Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Normal and Tangetial Components: Problem Solving01:24

Normal and Tangetial Components: Problem Solving

Consider a man with a mass of 70 kg seated in a chair connected to a pin support through a member BC. If the man maintains an upright position, the task is to determine the horizontal and vertical reactions of the chair on the man when the member makes a 45° angle with the horizontal. At this moment, the man has a speed of 5 m/s, increasing at a rate of 1 m/s².
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Counting parts and wholes and the mastery of partitive language.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Dwell Times Reveal Effects of Abstract Event Type on Attention Allocation.

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

Representation of event boundedness in English and Mandarin speakers.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Association Between Sexual Orientation and the Impact, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Endometriosis.

LGBT health·2025
Same author

Pragmatic communication and Theory of Mind.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

The Unforgettable "Mel": Pragmatic Inferences Affect How Children Acquire and Remember Word Meanings.

Developmental science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Spatial reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans.

Peggy Li1, Linda Abarbanell, Lila Gleitman

  • 1Laboratory for Developmental Studies, Harvard University, 25 Francis Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. pegs@wjh.harvard.edu

Cognition
|April 13, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Tseltal speakers easily solved spatial reasoning tasks that were incongruent with their language

More Related Videos

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Linguistics
  • Cross-linguistic Studies
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Language communities utilize diverse spatial frames of reference (coordinate systems).
  • English predominantly uses egocentric frames (e.g., left-right), while Tseltal Mayan favors geocentric frames (e.g., north-south).
  • The hypothesis posits that linguistic frames of reference influence spatial concept availability and salience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how linguistic frames of reference impact spatial reasoning.
  • To test Tseltal speakers' spatial skills using tasks with unique solutions, varying in frame-of-reference congruence.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted with Tseltal speakers.
  • Tasks were designed to require a unique solution, contrasting language-congruent and language-incongruent frames of reference.
  • Performance was evaluated based on task completion and accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Tseltal speakers demonstrated proficiency in solving language-incongruent spatial problems.
  • Performance was more robust on language-incongruent tasks compared to language-congruent tasks.
  • This suggests language-specific frames are not always the most efficient for spatial reasoning.

Conclusions:

  • Linguistic frames of reference do not rigidly determine spatial reasoning capabilities.
  • Task ambiguity and probabilistic inferences may explain cross-linguistic differences in spatial problem-solving.
  • Spatial cognition can adapt to non-native frames of reference, especially in less ambiguous contexts.