Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Miscellaneous Factors01:19

Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Miscellaneous Factors

Drug distribution in the human body is a complex process influenced by various individual factors, including age, pregnancy, obesity, diet, body water composition, pH levels, and specific disease conditions.
Age plays a significant role due to differences in body composition among different age groups. Infants, for instance, have a higher proportion of total body water and lower albumin levels, a protein that binds drugs in the bloodstream. This unique composition in infants enhances the...
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effect of Auditory and Visual Recommendations on Choice.

Psychological science·2022
Same author

Publisher Correction: Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation.

Nature·2022
Same author

Compatibility effects in the perception of dispersion.

Cognition·2022
Same author

Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation.

Nature·2022
Same author

It takes two to self-disclose: Incremental theorists facilitate others' self-disclosure more than do entity theorists.

Journal of personality·2019
Same author

Anticipating divine protection? Reminders of god can increase nonmoral risk taking.

Psychological science·2015
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Extraneous factors in judicial decisions.

Shai Danziger1, Jonathan Levav, Liora Avnaim-Pesso

  • 1Department of Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 13, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Judicial rulings are not solely based on law and facts. Judges' decisions, specifically in parole cases, were significantly influenced by the time of day and hunger, demonstrating the impact of extraneous variables on legal judgments.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Judicial Decision-Making
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Legal formalism posits judges rationally apply law to facts.
  • Legal realism suggests psychological and social factors influence judicial rulings.
  • The influence of extraneous variables on judicial decisions remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test the influence of basic physiological needs on judicial decision-making.
  • To investigate the validity of the legal realism theory in judicial parole decisions.
  • To determine if judges' rulings are swayed by factors unrelated to legal merits.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of sequential parole decisions made by experienced judges.
  • Recording judges' food breaks to segment decision-making sessions.
  • Statistical analysis of ruling favorability across different decision sessions.

Main Results:

  • Favorable ruling percentages decreased significantly within decision sessions.
  • Ruling favorability dropped from approximately 65% to near zero before food breaks.
  • Rulings returned to baseline levels after judges took breaks.

Conclusions:

  • Judicial rulings can be influenced by extraneous variables, such as hunger.
  • The study supports legal realism by demonstrating non-legal factors impact judicial outcomes.
  • Findings highlight the need to consider psychological and physiological influences in legal decision-making.