Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention?

H Pashler1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divided attention: Storing and classifying briefly presented objects.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.

Consciousness and cognition·2001
Same author

Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

Perception and production of brief durations: beat-based versus interval-based timing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Dual-task interference is reduced when combining manual and vocal tasks, especially with unpredictable stimulus order. However, central interference persists, suggesting a need for strategies to manage errors in dual-task performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dual-task interference occurs when performing two tasks simultaneously.
  • Combining tasks with different response modalities (e.g., manual and vocal) may reduce interference.
  • Previous studies often used unpredictable stimulus orders, potentially confounding results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate dual-task interference when combining manual and vocal responses.
  • To examine the effect of variable stimulus order on interference between different response modalities.
  • To reconcile findings with the response selection bottleneck model.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted manipulating task modality (manual/vocal) and stimulus order.
  • Participants performed dual tasks, and reaction times and error rates were measured.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Speed stress was introduced in Experiment 3 to provoke errors.

    • Main Results:

    • Variable stimulus order significantly increased interference for two manual tasks.
    • Interference was only slightly exacerbated for manual-vocal task combinations.
    • Central interference, or the psychological refractory period, remained evident even with mixed modalities.

    Conclusions:

    • Response modality plays a crucial role in dual-task interference.
    • The response selection bottleneck model can account for these findings with amendments.
    • Strategies may be needed to prevent errors under speed stress when selecting manual responses.