Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care
W Charles Huskins1, Charmaine M Huckabee, Naomi P O'Grady
1Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Background:
Intensive care units (ICUs) are high-risk settings for the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE).
Methods:
In a cluster-randomized trial, we evaluated the effect of surveillance for MRSA and VRE colonization and of the expanded use of barrier precautions (intervention) as compared with existing practice (control) on the incidence of MRSA or VRE colonization or infection in adult ICUs. Surveillance cultures were obtained from patients in all participating ICUs; the results were reported only to ICUs assigned to the intervention. In intervention ICUs, patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to care with contact precautions; all the other patients were assigned to care with universal gloving until their discharge or until surveillance cultures obtained at admission were reported to be negative.
Results:
During a 6-month intervention period, there were 5434 admissions to 10 intervention ICUs, and 3705 admissions to 8 control ICUs. Patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to barrier precautions more frequently in intervention ICUs than in control ICUs (a median of 92% of ICU days with either contact precautions or universal gloving [51% with contact precautions and 43% with universal gloving] in intervention ICUs vs. a median of 38% of ICU days with contact precautions in control ICUs, P<0.001). In intervention ICUs, health care providers used clean gloves, gowns, and hand hygiene less frequently than required for contacts with patients assigned to barrier precautions; when contact precautions were specified, gloves were used for a median of 82% of contacts, gowns for 77% of contacts, and hand hygiene after 69% of contacts, and when universal gloving was specified, gloves were used for a median of 72% of contacts and hand hygiene after 62% of contacts. The mean (±SE) ICU-level incidence of events of colonization or infection with MRSA or VRE per 1000 patient-days at risk, adjusted for baseline incidence, did not differ significantly between the intervention and control ICUs (40.4±3.3 and 35.6±3.7 in the two groups, respectively; P=0.35).
Conclusions:
The intervention was not effective in reducing the transmission of MRSA or VRE, although the use of barrier precautions by providers was less than what was required. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; STAR*ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00100386.).
Insights
Intensive care units (ICUs) are high-risk settings for MRSA and VRE transmission. A study found that enhanced surveillance and barrier precautions did not reduce MRSA or VRE colonization or infection rates in adult ICUs.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Intensive care units (ICUs) present significant risks for healthcare-associated infections.
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) are major pathogens contributing to ICU infections.
- Effective strategies are needed to curb the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in ICUs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of enhanced surveillance for MRSA and VRE colonization.
- To assess the effectiveness of expanded barrier precautions in reducing MRSA and VRE transmission in adult ICUs.
- To compare an intervention strategy (surveillance plus barrier precautions) against standard care.
Main Methods:
- A cluster-randomized trial was conducted across multiple ICUs.
- Intervention ICUs received surveillance data and implemented expanded barrier precautions (contact precautions or universal gloving).
- Control ICUs followed existing practices without enhanced surveillance reporting.
Main Results:
- Despite increased use of barrier precautions in intervention ICUs, the incidence of MRSA or VRE colonization or infection did not differ significantly between groups.
- Healthcare providers in intervention ICUs did not consistently adhere to the required barrier precautions.
- The mean incidence per 1000 patient-days at risk was similar in both intervention and control ICUs (40.4 vs. 35.6).
Conclusions:
- The implemented intervention was ineffective in reducing the transmission of MRSA and VRE in adult ICUs.
- Suboptimal adherence to barrier precautions by healthcare providers may have limited the intervention's effectiveness.
- Further research is needed to identify effective strategies for controlling MRSA and VRE in critical care settings.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Microbiota Modulation by Antibiotics