Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

SIVQ-LCM Protocol for the ArcturusXT Instrument
07:37

SIVQ-LCM Protocol for the ArcturusXT Instrument

Published on: July 23, 2014

Quality evaluation of virtual slides using methods based on comparing common image areas.

Slawomir Walkowski1, Janusz Szymas

  • 1Faculty of Computing Science and Management, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland. slawowski@gmail.com

Diagnostic Pathology
|April 15, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring viewing behavior data from whole slide images to predict correctness of students' answers during practical exams in oral pathology.

Journal of pathology informatics·2015
Same author

Students' performance during practical examination on whole slide images using view path tracking.

Diagnostic pathology·2014
Same author

Whole slide imaging for educational purposes.

Journal of pathology informatics·2013
Same author

Synovial cysts of the lumbar spine.

Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska·2012
Same author

Surgical treatment of symptomatic vertebral haemangiomas.

Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska·2012
Same author

Histopathologic patterns of nervous system tumors based on computer vision methods and whole slide imaging (WSI).

Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam)·2011
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

An automated algorithm objectively compares virtual slide quality from different scanners. This method uses Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) features for accurate digital slide assessment, aligning with pathologist evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Digital pathology
  • Image analysis
  • Computational pathology

Background:

  • Variability in digital slide image quality across scanners necessitates objective assessment.
  • Pathologist evaluation of virtual slides can be subjective.
  • Automated algorithms are required for consistent quality comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and implement an automated algorithm for comparing virtual slide quality.
  • To objectively assess and compare image quality from multiple slide scanners.
  • To provide a quantitative method for evaluating digital slide acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Algorithm identifies corresponding areas and scale factors between virtual slides.
  • Selected image fragments are analyzed using Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM).

More Related Videos

Digital Analysis of Immunostaining of ZW10 Interacting Protein in Human Lung Tissues
07:40

Digital Analysis of Immunostaining of ZW10 Interacting Protein in Human Lung Tissues

Published on: May 1, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

SIVQ-LCM Protocol for the ArcturusXT Instrument
07:37

SIVQ-LCM Protocol for the ArcturusXT Instrument

Published on: July 23, 2014

Digital Analysis of Immunostaining of ZW10 Interacting Protein in Human Lung Tissues
07:40

Digital Analysis of Immunostaining of ZW10 Interacting Protein in Human Lung Tissues

Published on: May 1, 2019

  • Haralick features (e.g., contrast, entropy) are calculated and aggregated for quality comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • The method was tested on virtual slides from two different scanning devices.
    • Image quality factors were consistently higher for slides acquired with the Axioscope2 robotic microscope.
    • Results demonstrated the algorithm's ability to differentiate image quality.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed algorithm provides objective and automated evaluation of virtual slide quality.
    • Findings align with subjective assessments by pathologists.
    • The method shows significant potential for routine quality control in digital pathology.