Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

04:04
Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Chemoradiation for advanced primary vulval cancer.
T S Shylasree1, Andrew Bryant, Robert Ej Howells
1South East Wales Gynaecological Oncology Centre (SEWGOC), Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, South Wales, UK.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|April 15, 2011
Summary
Neoadjuvant and primary chemoradiation showed no significant difference in survival or adverse events compared to primary surgery for advanced vulval cancer. Further research is needed due to high bias in current studies.
Area of Science:
- Gynaecological Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Oncology
Background:
- Vulval cancer, a rare gynaecological malignancy, lacks a standard treatment for locally advanced stages (FIGO III-IV).
- Combined treatment modalities involving radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery are used, but their comparative advantages and disadvantages are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant and primary chemoradiation for locally advanced primary vulval cancer.
- To compare these chemoradiation approaches against other primary treatment modalities, including primary surgery or primary radiation.
Main Methods:
- Searched multiple databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) and clinical trial registers up to July 2009.
- Included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies with multivariate analyses of chemoradiation for advanced vulval squamous cell carcinoma.
- Independently abstracted data, assessed risk of bias, and analyzed overall survival and adverse events using hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR).
Main Results:
- One RCT and two non-randomized studies (total 141 women) met inclusion criteria; all had a high risk of bias.
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiation did not improve survival compared to primary surgery (RR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.87-1.91).
- No significant survival difference was found between primary chemoradiation and primary surgery in two studies (pooled adjusted HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.37-3.17). Adverse events and quality of life were not adequately reported.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence suggests no significant difference in overall survival or adverse events between chemoradiation (neoadjuvant or primary) and primary surgery for advanced vulval cancer.
- High risk of bias in retrospective studies, variations in regimens, lack of quality of life data, and inconsistent terminology limit definitive conclusions.
- Standardized terminology and stratification by tumor unresectability are needed for high-quality comparative studies in advanced vulval cancer treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
