Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplantation: a single center experience
Omer A Raheem1, Mohamed H Kamel, Padraiq J Daly
1Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Abstract:
We assessed our long-term experience with regards to the safety and efficacy of MMF in our pediatric renal transplant population and compared it retrospectively to our previous non-MMF immunosuppressive regimen. Forty-seven pediatric renal transplants received MMF as part of their immunosuppressive protocol in the period from January 1997 till October 2006 (MMF group). A previously reported non-MMF group of 59 pediatric renal transplants was included for comparative analysis (non-MMF group). The MMF group comprised 29 boys and 18 girls, whereas the non-MMF group comprised 34 boys and 25 girls. Mean age was 11.7 and 12 yr in the MMF and non-MMF groups, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection episodes was 11 (23.4%) and 14 (24%) in the MMF and non-MMF group, respectively. Two (3.3%) grafts were lost in the non-MMF group compared with one (2.1%) in the MMF group. Twenty-one (44.68%) patients in the MMF group developed post-transplant infections compared with 12 (20.33%) in the non-MMF group (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the use of MMF in pediatric renal transplantation was not associated with a lower rejection rate or immunological graft loss. It did, however, result in a significantly higher rate of viral infections.
Insights
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) did not lower rejection rates in pediatric kidney transplants. However, MMF significantly increased the risk of viral infections compared to older immunosuppression methods.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunosuppression
- Pediatric Transplantation
Background:
- Pediatric renal transplantation requires effective immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection.
- Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a commonly used immunosuppressant, but its long-term safety and efficacy in pediatric populations require evaluation.
- Previous immunosuppressive regimens provide a benchmark for assessing new treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of MMF in pediatric renal transplant recipients.
- To compare MMF-based immunosuppression with a non-MMF regimen in terms of rejection rates, graft loss, and infection incidence.
- To determine if MMF offers advantages over previous immunosuppressive strategies in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 47 pediatric renal transplants receiving MMF (1997-2006).
- Comparison with a historical cohort of 59 pediatric renal transplants on a non-MMF regimen.
- Assessment of acute rejection episodes, graft loss, and post-transplant infections.
Main Results:
- The MMF group (n=47) showed similar acute rejection rates (23.4%) compared to the non-MMF group (n=59) (24%).
- Graft loss was comparable: 1 (2.1%) in the MMF group versus 2 (3.3%) in the non-MMF group.
- The incidence of post-transplant infections was significantly higher in the MMF group (44.68%) than in the non-MMF group (20.33%) (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
- MMF use in pediatric renal transplantation did not reduce rejection rates or immunological graft loss.
- MMF was associated with a significantly increased incidence of viral infections in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
- Current immunosuppressive protocols using MMF require careful monitoring for infection in pediatric renal transplant patients.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management

