Utility of a simple algorithm to grade diastolic dysfunction and predict outcome after coronary artery bypass graft

Madhav Swaminathan1, Alina Nicoara, Barbara G Phillips-Bute

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. swami001@mc.duke.edu

Insights

A simplified algorithm for grading left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) after cardiac surgery enabled more patients to be assessed and accurately predicted long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This method improves risk stratification in coronary artery bypass graft patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Echocardiography
  • Cardiac Surgery

Background:

  • Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) grading is crucial for risk prediction post-cardiac surgery.
  • Current echocardiographic guidelines for LVDD grading are often limited by data availability and consistency.
  • A simplified LVDD assessment may enhance grading feasibility and predictive accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a simplified algorithm for LVDD grading after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
  • To compare the grading capacity and prognostic value of a simplified LVDD algorithm versus a comprehensive one.
  • To assess the association between LVDD grades and long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Main Methods:

  • Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography data from 905 CABG patients were analyzed.
  • Two algorithms for LVDD grading were compared: a comprehensive four-variable (A) and a simplified two-variable (B) approach.
  • Algorithm B utilized transmitral early flow velocity and early mitral annular tissue velocity.

Main Results:

  • Algorithm B graded 99% of patients (895/905), significantly more than algorithm A (62%, 563/905).
  • LVDD graded by algorithm B was significantly associated with MACE (p=0.013), unlike algorithm A (p=0.79).
  • Patients with the highest MACE incidence were ungradable with the comprehensive algorithm A.

Conclusions:

  • A simplified LVDD algorithm significantly increases the number of assessable patients after CABG.
  • The simplified algorithm is valid for risk prediction, correlating with long-term MACE.
  • This two-variable LVDD grading method offers a practical approach for similar patient populations.
Abstract