Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
14:58

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

Published on: October 20, 2017

Assessing prognosis from nonrandomized studies: an example from brain arteriovenous malformations.

J Raymond1, O Naggara, F Guilbert

  • 1Interventional Neuroradiology Research Unit, Department of Radiology, International Consortium of Neuroendovascular Centres, University of Montreal, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Quebec, Canada. jean.raymond@Umontreal.ca

AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology
|April 16, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same author

'Allocation concealment': the evolution and adoption of a methodological term.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2018
Same author

[Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2018
Same author

GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

Research involvement and engagement·2017
Same author

GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2017
Same author

Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> Project.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2017

Prognostic models for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) require rigorous validation. Unvalidated models and uncertain rupture risk estimates for brain AVMs can lead to dangerous clinical decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Recent studies on brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) natural history provide context.
  • Prognostic studies are crucial for understanding disease progression and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review principles and pitfalls in prognostic studies, particularly for rare diseases like brain AVMs.
  • To evaluate the reliability of prognostic models for brain AVMs based on recent publications.

Main Methods:

  • Review of multivariable prognostic research steps: model development, external validation, and clinical impact assessment.
  • Critical analysis of two recent publications on brain AVMs natural history.

Main Results:

  • Prognostic model performance often decreases in new populations; clinical impact studies are rare.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
14:58

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

Published on: October 20, 2017

  • Limited data and methodological concerns in brain AVM studies affect result reliability.
  • Estimates of annual rupture risk for brain AVMs are uncertain and can lead to significant errors when extrapolated.

    • Conclusions:

    • Unvalidated prognostic models should not guide clinical decisions for brain AVMs.
    • Current data limitations and methodological issues in brain AVM research undermine the reliability of prognostic estimates.
    • Relying on uncertain prognostic data for brain AVMs poses risks to patient care.