Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
Interphase FISH does not improve the detection of DEL(5q) and DEL(20q) in myelodysplastic syndromes
Nathalie Douet-Guilbert1, Angèle Herry, Marie-Josée LE Bris
1Laboratoire de Cytogénétique, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 22, avenue Camille Desmoulins, CS 93837, F-29238 Brest cedex 3, France. marc.debraekeleer@univ-brest.fr
Abstract:
Cytogenetic abnormalities identified by conventional cytogenetics (CC) have important prognostic and therapeutic roles in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) complements CC since it is able to evaluate large numbers of interphase and metaphase nuclei. The question has been raised as to whether interphase FISH in addition to CC is able to imprive the level of detection of del(5q) and del(20q) in MDS. This study performed interphase FISH with 5q and 20q probes in a series of 158 MDS patients with a normal karyotype. No hidden del(5q) or del(20q) was detected. A review of the literature identified 20 patients (1.96%) of 1018 patients (including the current series) and 3 (0.91%) of 331 patients to have a del(5q) or del(20q). Therefore, interphase FISH adds little, if any, improvement to the probability of detecting these deletions. However, interphase FISH is recommended in patients with no cell growth or when fewer than 20 metaphases are available for CC analysis.
More Related Videos
07:53Interphase Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Bone Marrow Smears of Multiple Myeloma
Published on: April 15, 2022
10:14Detection of Inter-chromosomal Stable Aberrations by Multiple Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (mFISH) and Spectral Karyotyping (SKY) in Irradiated Mice
Published on: January 11, 2017