Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
Apparent virus contamination in biopharmaceutical product at centocor
Linda C Hendricks1, Jarrat Jordan, Tong-Yuan Yang
1Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 1 Johnson & Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, NJ 08933-0001.
Abstract:
Out-of-specification (OOS) results were reported by a contract lab in the in vitro adventitious agent assay (AVA) for two products manufactured using mouse myeloma cells in perfusion bioreactors. Cytopathic effect observed for test article-inoculated MRC-5 monolayers resembled foci seen in tissue culture cells infected with transforming viruses. All reasonable known technologies, including highly sensitive, state-of-the-art methodologies and multiple, redundant, and orthogonal methods, were deployed to screen broadly for potential viral and microbial contaminants. Due to the appearance of apparent foci, testing for murine, bovine, and human polyomavirus contamination was heavily represented in the analytical investigation. The results obtained in this extensive screening provided convincing evidence for the lack of an infectious viral or other biological agent. Although the initial investigation produced no reason to invalidate AVA yielding OOS results or to suspect an assay artifact, an extended evaluation revealed several irregularities at the contract test lab reporting the OOS results. The extended investigation also included attempts to reproduce OOS results at alternate contract testing labs and an inter-laboratory study in which methodological differences in the AVA at the three different contract labs were investigated. Only the contract lab initially reporting the OOS results reported foci during this extended evaluation. The results of the inter-laboratory study suggested that the foci artifact might be attributed to the prolonged exposure of the MRC-5 monolayer to cell debris present in the test article. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy and transmission electron microscopy were subsequently used to provide convincing evidence that the foci observed in test article-inoculated AVA wells were composed of a core of degraded myeloma cell debris covered by one or more layers of MRC-5 cells. The observation that the foci were detected in the AVA at a contract lab where the MRC-5 monolayer is exposed to production cell line debris for a prolonged period strongly suggests that these foci form when MRC-5 grow over the cell debris present in the test article. The cumulative results of the investigation supported the conclusion that the OOS results were artifacts of the AVA test system and not a result of contamination with a virus or other biological agent. Testing was discontinued at the contract lab generating the OOS results and validated at a second contract lab. Manufacturing resumed in consultation with health authorities. The lots were retested following a standard operating procedure (SOP) already in place and ultimately dispositioned for use in normal distribution channels.
Insights
Out-of-specification (OOS) results in adventitious agent assays (AVA) were found to be artifacts, not contaminants. Investigations revealed cell debris, not viruses, caused the OOS results, allowing manufacturing to resume.
Area of Science:
- Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
- Cell Culture Technology
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Out-of-specification (OOS) results were reported for products manufactured using mouse myeloma cells in perfusion bioreactors.
- The observed cytopathic effect in the adventitious agent assay (AVA) resembled viral infection, prompting an extensive investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the root cause of OOS results in the AVA.
- To determine if OOS results were due to viral/microbial contamination or an assay artifact.
Main Methods:
- Broad screening for viral and microbial contaminants using state-of-the-art methodologies.
- Inter-laboratory study to investigate AVA methodological differences.
- Confocal immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopy to analyze foci formation.
Main Results:
- Extensive screening provided no evidence of viral or microbial contamination.
- Only the initial contract lab reported OOS results, which were not reproducible at other labs.
- Foci were identified as degraded myeloma cell debris overgrown by MRC-5 cells, an artifact of prolonged exposure in the AVA.
Conclusions:
- The OOS results were artifacts of the AVA test system, not biological contamination.
- Testing was moved to a validated lab, and manufacturing resumed after retesting and consultation with health authorities.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Excipients and Impurities-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
Biopharmaceutical Factors Influencing Drug Product Design: Overview

