Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone
Thomas Hambrock1, Diederik M Somford, Henkjan J Huisman
1Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre St. Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. t.hambrock@rad.umcn.nl
Purpose:
To retrospectively determine the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) obtained with 3.0-T diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and Gleason grades in peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Materials And Methods:
The requirement to obtain institutional review board approval was waived. Fifty-one patients with prostate cancer underwent MR imaging before prostatectomy, including DW MR imaging with b values of 0, 50, 500, and 800 sec/mm(2). In prostatectomy specimens, separate slice-by-slice determinations of Gleason grade groups were performed according to primary, secondary, and tertiary Gleason grades. In addition, tumors were classified into qualitative grade groups (low-, intermediate-, or high-grade tumors). ADC maps were aligned to step-sections and regions of interest annotated for each tumor slice. The median ADC of tumors was related to qualitative grade groups with linear mixed-model regression analysis. The accuracy of the median ADC in the most aggressive tumor component in the differentiation of low- from combined intermediate- and high-grade tumors was summarized by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (A(z)).
Results:
In 51 prostatectomy specimens, 62 different tumors and 251 step-section tumor lesions were identified. The median ADC in the tumors showed a negative relationship with Gleason grade group, and differences among the three qualitative grade groups were statistically significant (P < .001). Overall, with an increase of one qualitative grade group, the median ADC (±standard deviation) decreased 0.18 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.02. Low-, intermediate-, and high-grade tumors had a median ADC of 1.30 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.30, 1.07 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.30, and 0.94 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.30, respectively. ROC analysis showed a discriminatory performance of A(z) = 0.90 in discerning low-grade from combined intermediate- and high-grade lesions.
Conclusion:
ADCs at 3.0 T showed an inverse relationship to Gleason grades in peripheral zone prostate cancer. A high discriminatory performance was achieved in the differentiation of low-, intermediate-, and high-grade cancer.
