Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
[Remarkable results with candesartan]
Frans H Rutten1, Rolf H H Groenwold
1Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Julius Centrum voor Gezondheidswetenschappen en Eerstelijns Geneeskunde, Utrecht, the Netherlands. f.h.rutten@umcutrecht.nl
Insights
Candesartan use was linked to lower mortality in heart failure patients compared to losartan. However, this observational study
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) management involves various medications, including angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).
- Observational studies comparing ARBs like candesartan and losartan in HF populations can provide real-world insights.
- Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have established the efficacy of ARBs in HF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comment on an observational study comparing candesartan and losartan in patients with heart failure.
- To critically evaluate the methodology and potential biases of the original study.
- To discuss implications for clinical practice and future research.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of an observational study involving 30,254 Swedish heart failure patients.
- Review of propensity score methods used for confounding adjustment.
- Assessment of potential biases including drug adherence, dosage equivalence, and loss-to-follow-up.
Main Results:
- The original study suggested candesartan was associated with lower all-cause mortality than losartan (HR 0.70).
- The authors of the comment argue this finding may be confounded by non-equipotential dosages and differential drug adherence.
- Selective loss-to-follow-up was also identified as a potential source of bias.
Conclusions:
- The observational study's findings should not alter current clinical practice for heart failure management.
- Methodological limitations, including non-equipotential dosing and adherence issues, may explain the observed mortality difference.
- Head-to-head comparisons of ARBs should ideally be conducted in randomized controlled trials with equipotential dosages.
Abstract:
Comments on: Eklind-Cervenka M, Benson L, Dahlstrom U, Edner M, Rosenqvist M, Lund L. Association of candesartan vs losartan with all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. JAMA 2011;305:175-82. In a large observational study in 30,254 patients with heart failure (with and without reduced ejection fraction) from a Swedish registry, the prescription of candesartan vs losartan was associated with a lower mortality risk after correction for confounding by the propensity scores method (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.81; p < 0.001). We conclude that this study should not change clinical practice, as several alternative explanations for this result should be considered. Firstly, lower drug adherence in everyday practice as compared with that in RCTs has a greater effect on results with losartan as it has a higher sensitivity to a missed dose than candesartan does. Secondly, 'low' dose losartan was compared to 'high' dose candesartan (non-equipotential dosages). Both of the factors mentioned above could have resulted in insufficient angiotensin receptor blocking by losartan as compared with candesartan, and are related to the inadequate use of losartan. In addition, adjustments for confounding in this observational study cannot be evaluated properly. Finally, there was considerable (selective) loss-to-follow-up, which could also have led to bias. Head-to-head comparisons of drugs should be done with equipotential dosages in an RCT, not in an observational study.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Potassium-Sparing Diuretics