Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Hematologic and immunologic parameters in Zimbabwean infants: a case for using local reference intervals to monitor
Stephanie B Troy1, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, LauraLe Dyner
1Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5208, USA. sbtroy@stanford.edu
Insights
Laboratory reference intervals for African infants differ significantly from Western standards. This study establishes new Zimbabwean infant reference intervals, highlighting discrepancies in hematologic and immunologic values crucial for pediatric trial safety assessments.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Hematology
- Clinical Immunology
- Global Health Research
Background:
- Novel therapy trials in African infants often use Western laboratory reference intervals.
- Existing research indicates ethnic and geographic variations in hematologic and immunologic reference ranges.
- This discrepancy can lead to misinterpretation of adverse events in African pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish accurate hematologic and immunologic reference intervals for Zimbabwean infants.
- To assess the impact of using Western reference intervals on identifying adverse events in African infants.
- To inform the reevaluation of toxicity assessment criteria in pediatric trials in sub-Saharan Africa.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 542 blood samples from 269 HIV-uninfected, black, Zimbabwean infants aged 3, 5, and 9 months.
- Calculation of reference intervals for key hematologic parameters (platelets, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume) and immunologic markers (CD4%).
- Comparison of calculated intervals with established Western reference ranges and adverse event criteria.
Main Results:
- Significant proportions of Zimbabwean infants had platelet counts (44%), hemoglobin (19%), and mean corpuscular volume (41%) outside Western normal ranges.
- A majority of hemoglobin values (65%) met US National Institutes of Health Division of AIDS adverse event criteria.
- A majority of CD4% values (71%) indicated immunodeficiency by World Health Organization criteria.
Conclusions:
- Established Western hematologic and immunologic reference intervals are inappropriate for evaluating Zimbabwean infants.
- There is a critical need to reevaluate and adapt reference intervals for pediatric trials in sub-Saharan Africa.
- Accurate, localized reference intervals are essential for reliable safety monitoring and effective therapeutic interventions in diverse pediatric populations.
Abstract:
Studies investigating novel therapies in African infants report laboratory adverse events based on reference intervals from white Western infants. However, prior studies have shown that reference intervals differ based on ethnicity and geographic location. We calculated reference intervals for Zimbabwean infants by analyzing the hematologic and immunologic values found in 542 blood samples from 269 HIV-uninfected, black, Zimbabwean infants at 3, 5 and 9 months of age. Substantial proportions of the platelet counts (44%), hemoglobins (19%) and mean corpuscular volumes (41%) were outside published normal ranges. The majority (65%) of hemoglobin values qualified as a United States National Institutes of Health Division of AIDS adverse events. The majority (71%) of CD4% values indicated immunodeficiency by World Health Organization criteria. Hematologic and immunologic reference intervals used to evaluate toxicities in pediatric trials in sub-Saharan Africa need to be reevaluated to account for differences in ethnicity, geographic location, nutrition and socioeconomic status.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions

