Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and CausationStatistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. A relationship between variables shows correlation, but it does not show cause-and-effect. A direct cause-and-effect relationship requires additional controlled experiments. If no consistent relationship exists between the variables, then there is no correlation.Correlation versus CausationIf the dependent variable increases or decreases when the...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reward-induced endogenous pain inhibition scales with action-outcome certainty in humans.

Pain·2026
Same author

Adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease: clinical implementation and outlook.

Nature reviews. Neurology·2026
Same author

Varying patterns of association between cortical large-scale networks and subthalamic nucleus activity in Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

The deep brain stimulation response network in Parkinson's disease operates in the high beta band.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Spatial signature of low-frequency network changes accounts for pallidal stimulation outcome in cervical dystonia.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Spontaneous network transitions predict somatosensory perception.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Human peripheral nerve xenografts and rat peripheral nerve allografts implanted to the striatum: Methodology and initial findings of cell-based therapy" [J. Neurosci. Methods 434 (2026) 110825].

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Sombor-based graph-theoretic framework for the structural characterization of neuro-metabolic organic acids.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Pupil-DLC: an open-source deep learning pipeline for scalable, marker-less tracking of pupil dynamics across conscious and unconscious states.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Time as the language of Behavior: events, sequences, patterns and meanings.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Detection of cochlear microphonic for differential diagnosis between auditory neuropathy mice and noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss mice.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Assessment metrics for pain control in rats: A methodological commentary.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Reliability of multivariate causality measures for neural data.

Esther Florin1, Joachim Gross, Johannes Pfeifer

  • 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Esther.Florin@uk-koeln.de

Journal of Neuroscience Methods
|April 26, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating multivariate causality measures for neural signals reveals squared partial directed coherence (sPDC) with the leave-one-out method (LOOM) as the most reliable approach for assessing signal directionality.

More Related Videos

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Granger causality-based multivariate measures are increasingly used to assess neural signal directionality.
  • A comprehensive evaluation of the reliability of these causality measures is lacking.
  • Understanding neural connectivity requires robust methods for determining signal direction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the performance and reliability of five different multivariate causality measures.
  • To assess the impact of data length, noise, coupling strength, and model order on measure performance.
  • To compare the effectiveness of random permutation and leave-one-out methods for significance testing.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations were performed using data from magnetoencephalography, electroencephalography, electromyography, and intraoperative local field potentials.
  • Five causality measures were evaluated: squared partial directed coherence (sPDC), partial directed coherence (PDC), directed transfer function (DTF), direct directed transfer function (dDTF), and transfer function.
  • The influence of data length, noise levels, coupling strength, model order, and significance testing methods (random permutation, LOOM) was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Squared partial directed coherence (sPDC) combined with the leave-one-out method (LOOM) demonstrated the highest reliability and robustness for assessing neural data directionality.
  • Directed transfer function (DTF), and direct directed transfer function (dDTF) struggled to differentiate between direct and indirect connections.
  • The study identified sPDC with LOOM as a superior method for reliable neural connectivity analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide crucial guidance for selecting appropriate causality measures in neuroscience research.
  • sPDC with LOOM offers a reliable method for accurately inferring directionality in neural signals.
  • This systematic evaluation aids in distinguishing conflicting evidence and improving the interpretation of neural data.