Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Deriving measures of intensive care unit antimicrobial use from computerized pharmacy data: methods, validation, and
David N Schwartz1, R Scott Evans, Bernard C Camins
1Division of Infectious Diseases, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA. david.schwartz@hektoen.org
Objective:
To outline methods for deriving and validating intensive care unit (ICU) antimicrobial utilization (AU) measures from computerized data and to describe programming problems that emerged.
Design:
Retrospective evaluation of computerized pharmacy and administrative data.
Setting:
ICUs from 4 academic medical centers over 36 months.
Interventions:
Investigators separately developed and validated programming code to report AU measures in selected ICUs. Use of antibacterial and antifungal drugs for systemic administration was categorized and expressed as antimicrobial-days (each day that each antimicrobial drug was given to each patient) and patient-days receiving antimicrobials (each day that any antimicrobial drug was given to each patient). Monthly rates were compiled and analyzed centrally, with ICU patient-days as the denominator. Results were validated against data collected from manual review of medical records. Frequent discussion among investigators aided identification and correction of programming problems.
Results:
AU data were successfully programmed though a reiterative process of computer code revision. After identifying and resolving major programming errors, comparison of computerized patient-level data with data collected by manual review of medical records revealed discrepancies in antimicrobial-days and patient-days receiving antimicrobials that ranged from less than 1% to 17.7%. The hospital from which numerator data were derived from electronic records of medication administration had the least discrepant results.
Conclusions:
Computerized AU measures can be derived feasibly, but threats to validity must be sought out and corrected. The magnitude of discrepancies between computerized AU data and a gold standard based on manual review of medical records varies, with electronic records of medication administration providing maximal accuracy.
More Related Videos
09:59Application of the Intelligent High-Throughput Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing/Phage Screening System and Lar Index of Antimicrobial Resistance
Published on: July 21, 2023
12:03Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters