Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

07:23
Retinal Vascular Reactivity as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: March 26, 2020
Validation of optical low coherence reflectometry retinal and choroidal biometry
Scott A Read1, Michael J Collins, David Alonso-Caneiro
1Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. sa.read@qut.edu.au
Summary
Optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometry measurements of retinal thickness and choroidal thickness show strong correlation and agreement with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) in young adults.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Optics
- Retinal Imaging
Background:
- Accurate measurement of retinal thickness (RT) and choroidal thickness (ChT) is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring various ocular conditions.
- Optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometry and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) are advanced imaging techniques used for ocular measurements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy and agreement of RT and ChT measurements obtained using an OLCR biometer (Lenstar LS 900) versus an SD OCT device (Copernicus SOCT HR).
- To evaluate the reliability of OLCR biometry for retinal and choroidal thickness assessment in young, healthy individuals.
Main Methods:
- Twenty young adult subjects underwent foveal RT and subfoveal ChT measurements using both OLCR biometry and SD OCT.
- RT and ChT from OLCR were derived from manual A-scan analysis; SD OCT measurements were based on averaged B-scan images.
- Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to compare measurements from the two instruments.
Main Results:
- High correlations were observed between OLCR and SD OCT for both RT (r=0.80) and ChT (r=0.94) (p<0.0001).
- Mean RT measurements were highly similar: 195 ± 17 μm (SD OCT) and 196 ± 16 μm (OLCR), with a mean difference of 1 ± 8 μm.
- Mean ChT measurements also showed good agreement: 324 ± 71 μm (SD OCT) and 328 ± 84 μm (OLCR), with a mean difference of 4 ± 24 μm.
Conclusions:
- OLCR biometry provides retinal thickness and choroidal thickness measurements that are highly correlated with and in good agreement with SD OCT.
- These findings suggest that OLCR biometry is a reliable tool for assessing retinal and choroidal thickness in young adults.
