Validity of maternal birthweight recall among Colombian children

Caroline E Boeke1, Constanza Marín, Henry Oliveros

  • 1Department of Nutrition and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. cboeke@hsph.harvard.edu

Insights

Maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age 5-12 years later is clinically different from hospital records. This recall bias can weaken observed associations between birthweight and childhood obesity, suggesting cautious use in epidemiological studies.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Perinatal Research

Background:

  • Low birthweight and preterm birth are linked to long-term health issues.
  • Accurate birthweight data is crucial for epidemiological studies but often difficult to obtain.
  • Understanding recall bias in birthweight is essential for reliable research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age.
  • To investigate how recall bias affects the association between birthweight and childhood obesity.
  • To evaluate the validity of recalled birthweight data in epidemiological research.

Main Methods:

  • Surveyed 3,202 mothers of schoolchildren (aged 5-12) in Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Compared recalled birthweight and gestational age with hospital birth records in a subsample (n=279).
  • Analyzed sociodemographic factors associated with recall bias.

Main Results:

  • Maternal recall overestimated mean birthweight by 129g compared to hospital records.
  • Recall sensitivity for low birthweight and preterm birth was moderate (0.66-0.67).
  • Recall bias weakened associations between birthweight and childhood obesity metrics.

Conclusions:

  • Maternal recall of birthweight 5-12 years post-birth is subject to clinically significant bias.
  • Recall bias can attenuate observed links between birthweight and later obesity.
  • Use of recalled birthweight data in epidemiological studies requires caution, especially in comparable settings.

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Longitudinal Studies01:26

Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...