Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sample Size Calculation

Sample Size Calculation

Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Note on "A Comparison of Two Methods for Adaptive Multi-Arm Two-Stage Design".

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

Clinical trials with interim analyses: standardizing terminology to increase clarity.

Trials·2025

Same author

Two-stage group-sequential designs with delayed responses - what is the point of applying corresponding methods?

BMC medical research methodology·2024

Same author

Efficient Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials of Interventions for COVID-19.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2021

Same author

Nested combination tests with a time-to-event endpoint using a short-term endpoint for design adaptations.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2019

Same author

Recent advances in methodology for clinical trials in small populations: the InSPiRe project.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.

Gernot Wassmer¹

¹ADDPLAN GmbH, and Institute for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. wassmer@addplan.com

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

|April 26, 2011

Summary

Confirmatory adaptive designs enable data-driven treatment arm selection in multi-arm trials without compromising type I error control. This study assesses sample size calculations and control group allocation for two-stage adaptive designs.

More Related Videos

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trial Design
Statistical Methodology

Background:

Confirmatory adaptive designs allow for data-driven modifications during clinical trials.
The combination testing principle provides a general methodology for adaptive designs.
Adaptive designs can facilitate treatment arm selection and sample size recalculation while maintaining statistical integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess sample size determination methods for multi-armed adaptive trials.
To evaluate the impact of control group sample size on adaptive design efficiency.
To examine the weighting scheme within the combination testing framework for two-stage designs.

Main Methods:

Focus on two-stage adaptive designs.
Assessment of sample size calculations, including ad hoc methods like Bonferroni correction.
Analysis of the choice of control group sample size.
Investigation of the weighting scheme in the combination testing approach.

Main Results:

The study assesses various sample size calculation methods for multi-armed adaptive designs.
The choice of control group sample size is identified as a critical factor.
The weighting scheme within the combination testing approach is considered.
Simulation tools are generally necessary for evaluating the statistical properties of these designs.

Conclusions:

Adaptive designs, utilizing the combination testing principle, offer flexibility in multi-armed trials.
Careful consideration of sample size, particularly the control group allocation, is crucial for efficient adaptive designs.
Simulation is often required to fully understand the performance of these complex designs.