Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Household physical activity contributions to total physical activity and its associations with cardiometabolic risk factors: a Brazilian adult population analysis.

BMC public health·2025
Same author

Effects of physically active lessons and active breaks on cognitive performance and health indicators in elementary school children: a cluster randomized trial.

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity·2025
Same author

An ecological view on the correlates of sedentary behavior in Brazilian adolescents: a cross-sectional study with network analysis.

Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors·2025
Same author

Association of meeting the 24-h movement guidelines with high blood pressure in adolescents: a cross-sectional study.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Physical Fitness Surveillance and Monitoring Systems Inventory for Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review with a Global Perspective.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2024
Same author

What are the correlates of intention to be physically active in Brazilian adolescents? A network analysis.

BMC public health·2023
Same journal

Psychometric Evaluation of a Contextualized Version of the German BFI-2 for the Digital World Across Self- and Other-Ratings.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Case Studies with the Rorschach Test: A Systematic Literature Review.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

A Stratified Analysis of Body Perception, Interoception and Somatosensory Brain Processing in Healthy Adults.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Predicting the Level of Suicide Risk with the MMPI-3.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS): Revisiting Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance in the General Spanish Population.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

The Particularism vs. Bribery Tolerance Scale: Who is Uniquely Vulnerable to Relational Temptations for Bending Rules?

Journal of personality assessment·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

One more datum on Rorschach form quality.

Danilo R Silva1, Antonio A Pires

  • 1Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Portugal. danilo@fpce.ul.pt

Journal of Personality Assessment
|April 26, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated Rorschach Form Quality (FQ) scoring differences between US and Portuguese normative data. While overall FQ means were similar, individual response scoring revealed notable discrepancies, suggesting cultural adaptations may be beneficial.

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra
05:14

Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra

Published on: September 8, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra
05:14

Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra

Published on: September 8, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Psychological Assessment
  • Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Rorschach Form Quality (FQ) scoring differences are noted in international normative data.
  • Exner's (2003) Table A is the standard for FQ scoring.
  • Cultural variations may influence Rorschach response interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if Exner's FQ scoring system explains lower FQ in non-US normative data.
  • To compare FQ scoring using US-based (Table A) and Portuguese-specific (Table P) tables.
  • To assess the cross-cultural applicability of Rorschach FQ norms.

Main Methods:

  • Rorschach protocols from 180 Portuguese children (6-10 years) were scored using Exner's Table A.
  • A Portuguese FQ table (Table P) was developed from 400 nonpatient children's protocols.
  • Janson's (2003) iota coefficient evaluated agreement between the two scoring approaches.

Main Results:

  • Mean differences between FQ variables from Table A and Table P were insignificant.
  • Significant discrepancies in the Form Quality unusual (FQu) variable emerged when scoring individual responses.
  • Inter-rater reliability analysis indicated notable differences in specific FQ scoring.

Conclusions:

  • Universal application of Rorschach normative data is plausible but requires careful consideration.
  • Developing culturally specific FQ tables may preserve unique national or cultural particularities.
  • Cultural context is crucial for accurate Rorschach interpretation and normative comparisons.